# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0481
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0481?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 401, page id 1672256038:0481
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=481
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000481.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

IV. CLASS. ARC, DE MENTE D. TNOMF. 40Y
PAR A GR A P HYS V L ZLN YS.
Concluditur nec D. Thomam, nec vilum Theoloco-
rum, posse minus probabilem pro libertate opinio-
nem tutam facere.
Ver ab actu ad pocentiam consecutio sic legirima, con.
Lscludere licet, Theologoru neminem, nequidem ipsum
met Theologorum Principem, posse opinionem pro rri-
licate, Probabilem facere curam contra legem, quamdiu
inera probabilicatis fines continentur, nec cuadie in neces
Pariam. Id enim nunquam Factum a D. Thoma, neC tenta-
cum, nisi in his qua posset argumentis neceslario contir-
mare: Ergo nullihoc rnquam Auchorum concestum, quod
commune jus rolune quidam elle cuinstihet Doctoris Clas-
lici. Ancecedens probatur: Nullo exemplo probari porest
hocrnguam a D. Thoma Factum; nam ex omnibus S. D0-
ctoris scripris, Auchor in Theolosicis verlaristimus, nulla
reterre pornie, praeter duo, de dilaca Confetione, et de
rnicare derestationis omnium peccatorum: has vero de-
monstranimus minime fecisse secutas inera probabilicatis
Anes, sed inde extrarisse ri argumentorum, ee in ordinem
Superiorem enexisse. Nec Colum id centanie, sed expreste
docuit hoc nulli Theolororum elle concelsum, ve distiden-
tibus inter se Theologis Doctoribus, poMc qui(quam cer-
cum d curum Facere, contra jus, seu naturale, seu posti-
uum; quod nostri ofticii sc doceri d scire: de quamdiu dis-
senrient inter se Doctores, non exculabitur a peccaro, qui
secus qua sententia rera docet, quidquam aget contra legé.
Contirmatur: non porest exculari a peccato, qui Pen-
tentiam Fallam secutus, contra legem agit, nisi habeac
conscientiam erroncam cerram, de ignorantiam invinci-
bilem: Aequi D. Thomasnegat dari huiusmodiignoran-
tiam cuiuscum que juris etiam posiriui, quo nos instrui ec
imbui oporreac, e de quo nora nobis sint dissentiones
Theolororum. Teaque sive exempla, sive Scripra D, Th0-
mae consulamus, nec sibi, nec vili Doctorum, illud jus rin-
dicare, nec posse rsurpari ab vilociera culpam, ex D. Tho-
maecum documentis, cum exemplis colsisimus.
Nec mirum: neque enim vili Theolororum concestum
es, quod in jure incerprecando, negatum est Papiniano
Furisconsuleorum doctissimo; cuius camen opiniones sin-
sulares, ab Imperatore rocentus dubitariones. Onis erzo