# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0486
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0486?run=74
# Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1)
# Folio 406, page id 1672256038:0486
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=486
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000486.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DFSF. II. SECT. VI.
Ilanc retoanciqui Pheologi nullam admitrune, vel cecco
minimam iuris nacuralis, nec D. Thomas cuiuscunque
ruris; quo nos instructos, _ imbueos elle OPOrtCAt, ma-
xime si dissidium sic Theologorum, nec laceat inquiren-
cenr illud ius. Concra reco probabiliste in infinitum la-
xanc huiulmodi ignoranciam cuiulcunque iuris, re pro-
babilicati securae riam lacissimam aperiant: Ergo antiqui
Theologi a recencibus omnino dilcordes lune, nequidem
excepco S. Anchonino; quem Sanchez inter eos reponit;
qui in dubiis cutiorem parrem eligendam docent; ee qui
Secus ageree; contra propria conscientix dictamen pecca-
turum: Frgo nulsum habent ex antiquis, qui sibi Favears
remeriro cnostris in Medinam, re in primum aucho-
rem referatur huius inventi aue oloria aut inuidia.
Ad catalooum recentiorum, qui longo ordine cap. 10
referuneur pro sencentia, quae probabiles opiniones tutas
omnes Facir, mulca responder Vrendrochius, quae nobis
omnia non probantur: quaedam enim licet rera ridentur
asperius dicta, P, MCFCOTUS PAFC. 2. AFC. 26. mulea habet
perinde Forcia, led modestius seripta. Respondet itaque.
qui stanc contra doctores ex anciquis et recentibus, supo
rare à se dissencientes muleis nominibus, maximé numero,
auchorirare, e concordia. Numero quidem: quia quor-
quoc nostrum Medinam ancecellerunt, h Armillam excipias
nobilcum conreniune. Vincune etiam authoritare quia
licet recenciores anriquis uint Forre anreponendi, in iurc
Dolicino incerprecando; qu’od ab arbierio hominum pen-
deac, _ in dieS UECEUE; Si camen discepeario sic de iure
nacurali omnino immucabili e acerno, ad quod CoOntrO.
vecha nostra pertinet; quis neget anriquos Patres e Theo-
10r05 magis audiendos este quasi Magistros Modernis
mulco securiores: Denique R concordia res modica crel.
cunt, discordia magna dilabuntur; hinc eriam porior est
noltra caula: quia rna rox, rius est omnium nostrum
consensus: aduerlariorum vero non unt convenientia
celtimonia; vix duo incer se consentiune. Dispucarionis pri
MXe Sect. 2. ad finem, enumeravimus ex P. HercOrOrque
ad gnindecim dissidences sencencias: de nallus quod sciam
e Socierare praecer Tamburinum, detendir securitatem
probabilicatum, ea laxicare qua explicatur illo opusculo
nulla restrictione adhibita rerum necessicate medii ex prae
cepci, quale apponir Suareso