# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0492 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1672256038:0492?run=74 # Title: [Vera Mens D. Thomae Et eius Scholae, de opinionum ex Lege delectu ut qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversus D. Caramuelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum] Vera Mens D. Thomæ Et eius Scholæ, de opinionum ex Lege delectu vt qualibet re Morali explicata & defensa. Adversvs D. Caramvelis Apologema In D. Fagnanum (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:1) # Folio 412, page id 1672256038:0492 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1672256038&page=492 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1672256038/jpgs/default/00000492.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. D15L. el. SECT. VI tanmas in D. Thoma destisiis semper insticimus dec. Quiet cor Epilcopos referant, qui huiulmodi probabilicatem luis centuris contixerune: Nec dubium est, si hâc dere Conci- lium Oecumenicum haberetur, non minus lanciendis mo- cum regulis cerrioribus, quam olim Fidei dogmacibus ad verlus Hlarericos contirmandi, guin Custragiis Paltorum dAINATETUL, aUF adt MIMIIS IMETA CCETAS MetaS, 2deo Y25a Probabilicas cohiberetur. Sed praetermissis, quibus haec collatio scarer, aliis ririis. quartum e vlcimum acringam. Vellem certo lcire, an pro- Babilitatem a Caramuele explicatam, ac detenlam probent hi omnes recentiores, quos tacitorbique nomine, conten- dic aniciguorum seueritarem superare, e laxitatem corre- xisse; AEque re singulos paucis decurram, qui non solum Dlura benehcia illicire cum Corduba docent, led etiam con- era ip lum invalide recipi, nec poste curo seruari: qui contra Angelum e Certonem, non solum consuecudinem negli- Sendi ofticium diminum, Ced rno etiam die precermistum si- ne causa, damnant peccati mortalis: qui idem pensum ho- rarium imponune Subdiaconis e Monialibus: qui oua pro- hibent Quadraselma tempore, quo antiqui carnis rlum indulgebane: qui indictam jejunii lesem, consuecudine nondum Ermatam, olim sine culpâ, hodie negant ladi pol Sc: qui Leandrum carpune ad collacionem indulsentem octorncias (quam Cuo Caculo D. Anconinus damnabat pec- Cacimorcalis) acque re paucis omnia complectar, qui con- era Bernardum (male à Caramuele explicarum) censene leceshumanas, non solum poenam, sed eriam culpam in- Ferre, prore subjectâ leuem, aut srauem (quod acrius ex- Dendic Caramuel, quam exigat nostra disputatio.) Trerum quaero, an qui his de rebus paulo rigidius quam antiqui opinantur, adhaereane. Caramueli, quamlibet opi nionem probabilem de Fide e moribus, sutticere ad Palure. _ curam cse altorenti, ee hanc securirarem conciliari ab vno Auchore, caereris reclamantibus: Si hanc primam omnium oxinionem laxistimam, quae sic omnium laxitatum origo ejurene, illorum consilium laudamus, e nisi à le ipsis dis- sentiane, non dubiramus, quin mulco srauius ferant laxio- res Theologorum modernorum opiniones, de Pracepto Charicaris fere abrogaro, e alia sexcenca his similia acrius insectentur, quam octorncias cibi ad collationem die je- hunii permissas, quam excularum per horam diebus teltis