# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1677088362:0055 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1677088362:0055?run=74 # Title: [Sanctorum Augustini Et Thomae. Vera Et Una Mens, de Libertate humana, & gratia divina, explicatur, & Scholae Thomisticae asseritur] Sanctorvm Avgvstini Et Thomæ. Vera Et Vna Mens, de Libertate humanâ, & gratiâ diuinâ, explicatur, & Scholæ Thomisticæ asseritur (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:3) # Folio 15, page id 1677088362:0055 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1677088362&page=55 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1677088362/jpgs/default/00000055.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 1 DED. V LSIO C ALV FN LS HT. tungie, benesicio incellectus, de iudicio rniversali, que Porelt bona quaeque creara, nocare aliquo defectu, ac Proinde cum indifterenria amanda proponeie. Etis ita constituris euidens, est inter extremas sententiaa nosmedios, ab caquam cribuunenonnulli Tanlenio pri- mum; e mulco longius a Caluino differre, qui omnino inter se non conneniune: nam Caluinus vulc actus erigm indeliberatos esse liberos, ea libertare quae lufficiac ad malitiam peccari, quod nunquam Tansenius comniauie. cum ad libertarem exigat perfectam rei nocitiam ex pon- derationem: Ergo Calcem hoc dilerimen incercedie peae- cer catera quae subiungam. Nos vero ad libertarem exercicii, indifferentiam obie- ctinam inrellectus, e Formalem voluntatis regnirimus, (re incipiam primam Perri calumniam amoliri) qua naleatur vel ab obiectifiniri, vel ab ipsius principii dese- etu. Voluntas capax infinici boni, Colo increato clare cognico laciari, subijci, vel necelsicari porest; Caeteris A- nitis superior est, nisi per ignauiam se deijciac. Imo quando suoinforcunio, libertarem in bonum infinicum exCECet, e Deum obscure cognitum POtesE nOI aImaTC; ex infirmitare, aurionorancii porius est, quam ex vIIa li- bertatis perfectione: quia dimidiacam de rertiatam, ac Dene nullam bonitacis infiniea nociciam habet, de per eAusas calioines libertare aliquâ ex parce infelici, amOFCML intniciboni, malo suo, rel suspendie, rel in Faltidiu mutac. Adeo rerum elt, liberrari locum non esse, nisi obiecto rel principio defectus insic, e bonum quod sub. ficitur amandum, finicum sc, rel cum aliquo defectu mix- cum, vel s infinitum sE, obuoluacur cenebris, et ap Perentem laceat. Hinc ergo naseitur indifferentia obiecti, et intellectus; quae roique adest (sirisionem beacam, auc actus indeli- beraros excipias) quia nihil in obiecto ett, quod capere necestario possir aftectum. Iline obuia est responsio ad Primam Theophilicalumniam conera Bannem. AAingie illi, et aliis eiusdem insticuri Theologis, libertarem po- nere in indifferentia intellectus. He id quidem per COM. nium cogicanimus: Sed omnium nostrum lenlus ett, von duntarem caecam sequi iudicium inrellectus, quod cumr indisterentii proxonir prolequenda este omnia Anita b0-