# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0095
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0095?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 35, page id 167783496X:0095
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=95
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000095.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

s
DE RECTA AN DErM EIDE DOMKNTC,
P A R A GR A P AVS SECVNDVS.
Responsio ad 3. obiectiones quae aliquam
habent speciem Arcumenti.
TIRra argumenta lepotui a reliquis, concra Banne-
Lsium, Combetisium, e Spinam. Ouamuis enim
omnino fucilia sint, nec ad controuersiam nostram, id
est, ad res tidei perrineane; habene camen aliquam (DC-
ciem arsumenei, quia ex libris nostris peruntur quali ad
hominem.
Primum Argumentum instruis contra Bannelium à
Tuorum operum edirione, correcta posteriori, qua doce-
Bac accidentia Ruchariltia seruaca panis ec vini existen-
cia, post consecrarionem subsictere: quod ris damnarum
esle ab Innocencio V I I I. Furilis plane est haec cua argu-
ratio, reconnineaserroris Bannelium. Non dicam, s
quid inesser periculi, submorum secunda edicione, qua
locum correxit, ac proinde nullam superesse censurx,
vel reprehensionis causam. PFRrerCa: Respondeo Ten
Cum Bannehii esse omnino hyporherieum, supposira opi-
nione probabili ex Auicenna, ex Diuo Thoma, aliisque
Theologis, Parribus e Philolophis, Colius Deinacuram
sibi necellario existentiam vimlicare, quae subinde cuili-
bet substanciae crearae accidentario comperat, ab caque
distinguatur, qua iuxta aliquorum sentum, non modo
ipla, sed ejus accidentia subsictane. Ex hoc vicimo prin-
cipio, quod Bannesnec probat, nec improbac, conse.
quirur existentiam substancix panis e vini his destructis
superesse. Ouid horum ergo ad Adem pereiner s An non
mera PhiloCophica quaestio est: Neo Parres, aut Concilia
his PhiloCophix ericis mpsteria admi(CenE, nCC CUTanE
qua ratione accidentia existant, propriâ vel aliena exi-
Stentia, dummodo serventur, destructa panis ec vini roc
substancia: e ad hunc sensum Concilia _ ParreS InFeT
Pretatur Bannesius. Ouid erso haereleos porest huic len-
centia subesse, aut subodorari Perrus, cum Bannes Con-
ciliis et Pacribus reverentia adhibira, eam sensu omnino
Cachulico explicer: