# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0099
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0099?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 39, page id 167783496X:0099
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=99
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000099.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE RECTA EN DENHE EIDE DOMTNZC:
iis a ce contictis; Respondeo puram calumniam ere,
quod obiicis, Dominicanos ridelicet, allerere opinio-
nem Conceprionis immacularae esse Falsam, auc ImPTO
babilem. Numquid cordium nostrorum inspector es:
an pores de noltris intimis sensibus celtari, qui de cuis,
et quibuscumque rebus aperrissimis, Falleris auc menci-
ris lemper: Vndenouilti nos illius opinionis probabili-
eatem nesare, re inde convincas nos haereticos? Quia
inguis, Barcholomaens Spina Dominicanus fuie huius
sententixe. Ac quid rnus ad reliquos: An omnes in illius
rerba iurauimus An non praeceptis Pontificum pare-
mus. Scd, veiam actisi, ex principio intex nOS con
Ricuro, cuum re magis quam nos Argumentum riget.
Si decrecum Ponciticis veriulque parris probabilica-
em iildem verbis consticuit, eandem incurrit harelis no,
cam, qui alcerius parris probabilicarem nesauerie. Vide
quam caeco impetu in nosferaris, ve rnum spinam hx-
retis damnes, ee nos suspectos facias: Vide, mi Petret
velhanc damnationem remitras nobis oportet, quam
inculisti, relipse proprio iudicio damnaberis.
Ad alia, quae de Felto subdie Perrus concra P. Combe
Slium, muleâ responderi possene, a quibus, re Poncificiis
decreris pareamus, abstinemus. Vnum tantum 2dd0.
quoadmentem D. Bernardi, quem dicit Pcrus à Comm
Behisonon bene incellectam: hoc Perri dictum ad latie-
carem, e esticacissime refellir ipsemet Cabriet Valques
tom 2. In 3. P. 27. arr. 2. Cap. r9. quodincipic iam idem ad
restimonia parrum sixillarim dicamus, C imprimis inse-
nuc faseamur Bernardum, (5 Rspertum opposicum senten
tiam plane tradidsse; (5c.
Is est rerum laudandus delectus, ve certa dubiis ac pFo.
babilibus anceponas. Ouam aftert CombetisiuS ex GrX-
cisrnicam, ec ex antiqua Ecclesia cerre praecipuam Con-
ceprionis felti instimendi causam, Cumme probat Bellar-
minus libro 3. de culcu Sanctorum capite 16. eaque se cu-
eacur aduersus haerericorum insulcus. Idem prorlus ha-
bec Cardinalis Oregius capirer2. Cur ergo his duobus
praecermissis, solum Combehilium haereleos damnas d
Ouas rero e rrges, causae huius fecti, a revelarionilius
Herluini Abbaris, hominibus emunctae naris, e racua-
rumaurium, aliquid olene, et Conanenon omnino loli
 iisu