# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0108
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0108?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 48, page id 167783496X:0108
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=108
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000108.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.87
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

d. lB. 1.8EC4. 10
suspectus haerelis, HD. Choam Racuerec hdei reog.
Jam ad cl scl quem impuonat. e quo summi
Pontifices, ee Scripcura hoc regula nomen sibi rendi-
canc singulare.
Seu cum ira argumentarut Theophilus, viderurmihi
Beram imicari, qui rocem Anci Chriltianam vocac hoc
nomen Ecclesia fundamentum conceltum D. Perro, quod
Coli Chrilto concendie Beza convenire: eodem prortus
aburitur argumento quod in nos Theophilus incorquer,
Ced Facile est ex iplomer refellere. Iaec nomina fundamen-
rum, resula fider (e ve ab iplo exemplum Cumanus) apo.
Stoli rocabulum, neque prorlus quid idem Peu Iynoni.
mum, derniuocum, neque omnino diuerlum, sed ana-
logia quadam commune est mulcis: ita camen veseri
Peurx; ee concilio alciori ratione conveniac norio Regu.
ta quam D. Thomae asseramus, Pieur de fundamenti voca
bulo ad Chrictum, e ad Apostolos, vel de iplo apostoli
ciculo, quem ad Sanctum Franciscum Xaverium rule
percinere; necesse est iplum ad Bezx argumentum re.
Spondere, vel ad nostrum de Apostoli nomine quod con-
queritur alibi xore collacum D. Francisco Zauerio a P,-
ere Monstro. Qnare illum rrgemus luo argumento. D.
Thomae non aserimus ticulum infallibilis reoula, quall
nulli rei nequeas regulae nomen conterre, nis alleras in-
Fallibicacem, quid enim het clepsidris d horoloriis
quibus merimurhorarum moras re regulis primae, id
eltmotuicalorum inferioribus; hoc damnabis erroris
concra Philosophiam; sicur haerelis contra Adem, si quis
dixerie rirum lanctum ese regulam riex Christiana, quo
nihil in sclaps Lactunt, e in ore omnium Frequen
TinSE
2
qui2 D. Thoma recederet: nam COmMPCrIS eAet nON
LARAORALCIS OFeTAOIS
odece Emmnmilat probacur ab ipsins.
bo aloboplocbo se stb
Dermicius in lacoena Commendarionem D. TH.
dictam,
Ox haec quam ex Thonis reterune Theophilus a