# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0204 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0204?run=74 # Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4) # Folio 144, page id 167783496X:0204 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=204 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000204.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine # Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. LTB. X. SEC~. IL. ciam, ritum elt dadele, ea caurelâ, ne in vicium prolixti caris alieno coarcter vitio. IIlud enim imprimis animaduerro, quod Barcholo. mai a Maxerribus Lusicano idiomare edita narrar histo ria, ecribus illius gentis, qui Concilio Fridencino in- rerfuere Epilcopis, huncmulca paucis, alterum mulea mulris, certium pauca mulris (olitos explicare: hic po. Stremus Launoio caracter nescio an placear, cerre cenui- nus est, e convenit. Cu mulca his rncecim Epistolis pro- banda suscepisser, e mediocri rolumine id poruisser et- cere, duc cerre nici debuislet; Contra torus est in Parer. siscongerendis, quae nihil ad insticurum conferant, vel nildem exemplis ec aroumencis millies obcrudendis. Prima Epistola iam dilcussa, responsum est ad argu. mencum ex Epiltola Ealso aCcripra Ambrosio, ee verius ab Almsino Damalo acrribura, eandem vindicata si xitio; _ ab appellarione Marcionis a parerno damnar tione ob constupracam rirginem ad Sedem Apoltoli cam. Verumque argumentum proleguitur lingularibus Epiltolis priore longioribus, additis propemodum int. nicis cestimoniis Patrum, ex Ponciticum, quae Cano num lanctiones commendane, ii(que se obnoxios Sum mi Poncifices protirentur: quis nostrum hoc rnquam nesauic, seu ex directione, Peu ex coactione, Peu ex veroque capice hoc conscientie, onus de rinculum exi- Ctac: Dum haec congerie renerandae antiquiraris monu. menca apud omnes obuia, molem Epistolarum auger non rim aroumentorum: ee illum pictorem imitatur, de quo in Carnam Veneris coniecto auro dictum est, cum non posset Facere pulchram, divirem fccisse. Mallem Pauca, d selecta intringendis Caiecani solurionibus ido. nea, e validiora scripsisser, obmissis quae ex hiltoria Theodoreri, ex Epistosis Ambrosii, ee Ponrificum RO. manorum conslobat, nihil prorlus ad rem Facientia, nisi re prolixior, e Forre nolestior Epistola euadat. Non dicam Cardinali Perronio emunctioris naris homini, Theodoreri de Flauiano Antiochena tcclesia, id est suo Parriarcha, in quem proinde propensiorerat, Aidem magis suspectam, quam Socraris ee Soromeni, qui a parcium sudio aberane, quorum historiam rerio. rem