# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0213
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0213?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 153, page id 167783496X:0213
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=213
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000213.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

PX AMEN VIL. EF VTIL. EPLSL 1A
Si dispurationem exigamus ad has tres editiones legi
rimas, plane concidic argumentum Launoii, quod invi-
ctum pucabac: quia Cenlus Canonis legitimus est cen-
Cendus, qui singularem habet clausulam de Summo P’on.
citice. Ouare h quid ririum insic argumenro Aduerlarii,
eotum est a Cratiano Canonum collectore, non admo-
dum accurato, qui privilesio de Summo Poncitice (-
mile de aliis inferciule Epilcopis e Parriarchis: Sed qua-
roan Editioni oraex, Almarni, ee Anactasii sC eribus
minus standum, quam rni Graciano: de cum nullus sie
dubicandi locus, quin plures a doctis incerprecibus edi-
tionesrni a Ciraciano parum accurato Collectore, aue
callente Ciraecarum liccerarum prxeponderer; quaerendum
estaliud Launoio prasidium, reargumencum Aiudciac, e
Pola lectione Canonis responsio Caietani dissiliat.
Sed quid arsumencarioni ad hominem, qua vrgee
Launoius Caieranum: Dar ille ius Conciliis in Poncit-
cem dubium ec haerericum: Ergomale negac in Ponci-
ticem reum cuiuscunque criminis, quo abdicarionem
tanca dignicaris commeruerie: qualia sune prope in-
tinica, imo quodlibet minimum. E ad lechale pecca-
cum accelserie. Vehanc consecurionem, sine dubio pe-
riculolam submoneat Cdieranus. cohibet indicium inEra
Schilmaris et haereleos meras: id elt, dubix electionis ex
concencione comperitorum, aur rnius apertae haereleos
connicti. Si dicas hos limices graris ec immerito prxe
firi; hoc non obiici debuit à Launoio, sed oporruicim-
pusnari plurima, quibus Caicranus has metaS TUTaEUF 3
nec locus est hic dispucandi, cum Aduersarius censuris
eancum agac, nullis argumencis. Addo duo, quae rellem
a Launoio refelli.
Primum ex cradicione, aliud ex ipsiusmer Aduerlarii
documentis. Illud quidem ica habec: nulli Ponciticum
dicam a Conciliis scriptam, nis haeresis Hlonorio, et
apoctasix Marcellino, vel dubix, id est nullius electionis,
quamdiu euidentibus aroumeneis res diximi non pocest.
Hnic pravissimo ex cradicione argumenco aliud adiun-
50 perinde efficax ad hominem. Adeo immanC _ aEFDX
risum est, ex P’oncificixe digniraci intensum crimen haere.
seos, reillius comperrum Episcopum Bpistola 4. Pagina
24. ex Tulis Existol ad Faustum etici ab rnoquoque, e