# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0329
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0329?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 269, page id 167783496X:0329
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=329
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000329.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE OVASTIOHTB, TPRIS ET PACFI
268
sicut Poiemne indicium Beaco Thomae a Villa- nOVa: et-
sohidecerra est bearicudo huius Dini, ee illius Pontificis
authoritas legitima.
Secundi generis, de huic primo proximx TunE ex quae-
stionesiuris, quas Theolori necessaria consecutione ex
principiis renclaris deducunt, reluri conclusiones ex
praemissis, effectus a causis, proprierates à lua esenria.
neque enim eas immediace renelatas dixeris: Sicuri cum
quisherbam medicam digito demonstrat, non cense-
cur rim illius medendi aperire, nisi media essentix red
significatione, inde quadam consecurione deducitur. Ica
plane de rebus à Deo revelatis distinguunt Theologi.
Ouxedam a Deoimmediare reuclantur, alia vero remo-
ce de in causâ, rnde deducuntur: acque haec duo rerum
genera primae e secundae classis pleno iure ad Concilio-
rum ex Summi Poncifcis definiendi Facultarem pereine-
se conveniunt omnes Theologi, aliquo camen dileri-
mine, quod maxime ad rem irostram Facie, et diligen-
ter obseruari velimr.
Soco, Valques, de alii censene, veritarem ex rebus
reuclaris consecutione necessaria de euidenci deductam
hde credi oporrere ab eo, qui rim consecutionis capit;
alii vero negant, huiusmodi veritarem Ade divind credi
poste, si prinaco cantum discursu eliciaeur; sed ad id
opus esse definitione Poncificia, aut C oncilii, qu’a semel
adhibica, concendune propositionem secundae clasis, leu
remore renelatam in causa prouchi ad primam classem,
e accenseri Arriculis Adei Cacholica beneticio defini-
tionis. AF contra contendune Molina, Cranado, ee alii,
nulla Fcclesix definitione propolriones secundae clasis
Posse inde ad primam cransterri; sed sare semper secun-
do gradu, nec eum, qui definitam reritarem negaUE
ric; hab immediaca revelatione absic, haerericum este,
sed ad summum cemericaris, ec erroris damnandum. In
hac acerrima Theologorum, e dubia acque ancipici
disceptatione, ipsemet sulpen sushaereo; de licer pronior
in secundam sencentiam, alias sane improbare non
aulim anre iudicium Cummi Pontificis.
Sed quidquid sir de hoc secundo quaectionum iuris
genere, quae sidei proxime acringune aue inprediuncur
cines; cerrii generis lonse remorioreslunt, et Probabi-