# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0330
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0330?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 270, page id 167783496X:0330
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=330
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000330.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

L IB: P. SECF. IIV
lium opinionum classem constiruune, quod salua veriras
cecorum, quae sevelatione cradica sunc, illis assenriri
Polsis aur dissenciri. FTaec vlcima clactis omnium est am-
plissima, quod rerum dubiarum maximus sir ambitus,
certarum rero, ec cuidentium angultiores sine Fnes.
Dehis erro rebus probabilibus, cerrum est Concilia
e Pontitices, si quid vnquam sacuerunt, nunquam à
probabilium ordine ad secundum auc cerrium crexisse.
Non est quidem dubium, quin maximum pondus ad-
dane opinioni, quam e muleis probabilibus elegerunt:
Sed aliunde cerrum est, nunquam effecisse, nec obten-
disse, nisi praecesserit Fraditio, auc Reuclatio, rel ex
Revelatione necessario conlequantur, re Airiculis hdei
accenferentur, vel Aide Divina ab omnibus exciperentur.
Cerre si Molina non patiatur propolitiones secundi ge-
neris, id est fidei; Arriculis necessario connexas; vIld
definitione Pontificia, aue Conciliorum, prouchi ad pri.
nam claltem Articulorum Aidei; rix aequo animo terret
opiniones rertii generis, quas Palua Rcuelatione, de
Fradicione antiqua ad arbitrium propuonare aue impu-
onare raleas, ed posle rnquam conscendere. Sed quid.
quid sic de sencentia Molina, nullum Theologorum vidi,
qui propolicionibus certii generis cum concedat ad pri.
nam classem ascentum, quem Molina ctiam 2. Ordi-
nis rericaribus negat.
Hoc rno rerbo disiliune, ee in Fumum Facescune,
qualcunque 2. Diatriba in nos congerit, calumnia, quasi
Summi Poncifices, sicubi in aliquam huins certii generis
opinione inclinaverine, hâc ipsà signiticarione ad primu
genus evexerine; ec quidquid in sraciam concraria sen.
centixe scriprum Fuerir, haerelim relipiac. Ouam longe
abes, Theophile, a mence Capientissimorum Ponciticum,
quam peaepastere eorum dicta interprecaris: Cerre li
eam sibi aurhoritatem rindicarent, re guacunque pro-
babilia eligune, auc sequuntur, aliis indicerent excipien-
da vefide certa; quorquor scriberent Canones, aut li-
bros, librorum Canonicorum vim, e locum obtine-
rent; quandoquidem corum dictis, ee seripris par au-
Etoritas constaret. Nihil hâc consecurione cuidentius,
iuxca cuam, Pecre, arguendi, aue pocius calumniandi
aerem. Nihis magis a rericare, aur Poncisicum menre