# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0439
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0439?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 379, page id 167783496X:0439
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=439
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000439.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

PROBO, FAESO ASCRTDFK. D. TH.
a Patre, (5 Filio, non tanquam ex duobus principis, sed
tanguam ex uno, non duabus spirationibus, sed unica.
Sidicas idem fere esse, ac si Racuisser este rnum Spi-
ratorem, respondeo consecurionem esse non omnino
neceslariam, quia pender ex regulis de mulciplica-
tione nominis adiectiui, de substanciui: de licer D.
Thomas in L. dist. I2. Securus fuerie opinionem illorum,
qui nomen Spiracoris, re adiectiuum mulciplicane; c2-
Men, 1. P. 9. 36. 2. 4. hanc sencentiam seuocar, non ve
Censura dignam, Ced reminis reram, ec nomen Spi-
racoris secundum leges substanciuorum, nesac mulci-
plicari debere. Qua ergo Ade duos Spiracores aMeris à
Schola nostra admieri concra definirionem Concilii
Lugdunensis: Ouare Capienter admoner, Concilium
sacuisse rnam elle Spiracionem ec rnum principium,
permisisse vero dispucarioni Theologorum, rerum de-
beremus admierere ruum Spirarorem sccundum leges
nominis substanciui, anE auOS SPITAEOTES IUIXTa naCuTaME
adlectiuorum, quae nihuil vecat mulciplicari cancetor-
maernicace, si pluribus insir suppouris. Ouo sensu dicie
Hilarius 2. de Trin. Spiritum Sanctum à Patre (5 F ilio
anthoribus procedere.
Nonrideo quo fine obiicias nobis D. Thomam in 3.
dist. 9. 9. 2. 2PPeruisse, dici posse ab (que hareli, ilte homo
capic esse Deus. Cum iam ce monviller LOanneS AS.
Thoma, eo loco D. Thomam illius proposicionis non
meminisse. Verum quidem est dist. 7. sequenti, de hac
propolicione Sanctum Doctorem agere, de idem lta-
vere, quod de ilta Homo factro est Dens. Et ab veraque
abstinencium, quia resipic haereum Arrii.
Nelcio, vnde exrraxeris sertam (neque enim vilum
locum citas) qua nos fnsis dicere, Deum de poteniia
absoluea separare non posse albedinem a subiecto, (5 in
illo conservare. Quid mali est hoc negare, cum propoli-
tio concradictoria implicer idem accidens seinnoi à sub-
jecto, e in illo conteruorid Badem Ade GFXCZ FeteTS
propolitionem ejusdem ordinis decimam sextam, eum
qui sordet peccato mortali, eriam occulto, si alii impendat
correctionem, peccare morralicer. IIaec non est propolicio
nostra, sed cua calumnia. Verum quidem est D. Tho-
mam in 4. dist. 2y. 9. 9. alicuius culpx acculare, nOn