# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0455
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0455?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 395, page id 167783496X:0455
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=455
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000455.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

ZVTIL PROPOSTE. PERHPAZ. DEFEHSA
395
dicicenim, Corpus Christi viuum C) moriuum esse idem
numero simpliciter, id est, absolure, (3 nullo addiso; quia
scilicet, inquic S Doctor, est supposito idem, non aniem.
Eimplicirer, hoc estommino toraliter: Nam amisit in morte
aliquid ad essentiam vivi percinens, scilicet vitam. Imo
acuristime lubdic D. Thom. Si diceretur, quod Corpus
Christi morruum rotaliter idem remaneret, sequeretur
non esse corruprum, corrupiione, dico, mortis; quod est
heresis Caianisarum. C aueac ergo Perrus ne dum D. Tho.
ma calumniam molicur in illam haresim dilabaEuE.
Proposiriones, quae supersune examinanda, deduxie
S. Thomas ex doctrina recepia Platonis, ee Aristorelis
demareria primâ, quam puram pocentiam, d prope-
moduin nihil appellane, e opponunt Deo, re encium
intimum TUPTemO. Ex hiS InFeFE D. THOMAS PEODOA-
tionem primam, secundam, cerriam, octanam, deci-
mam, decimam- seprimam secundi ordinis. FaceOr
hus D. Thomae ec Ariltorelis propolitiones, longistime
abesse a Democrici, e Epicuri, et aliorum Philolopho-
rum placiris, qui generationes substanciales, animi im-
morcalicarem, divinirarem, de prouidenciam negabane
ex oppolico principio, quod maceria prima eslet ens
complerum, actualo, capax cancum Formarum acciden-
calium. Inde Galenus inferebae animam hominis NON
elle formam substancialem. sed harmoniam.
Vnde rideat Pecrus, rideane reliqui olores Doctrina
Thomistica, ec harum maxime proposicionum, mace-
siam non habere propriam existentiam; implicare le-
parari ab omni Formâ, recipere immediare accidencia,
dari relolurionem rique ad maceriam primam; ridcanc,
inquam, e observent dum ilta explodune re paradoxa,
causam axere Demoeriri, Epicuri, Religionis e Proni-
denria hostium instaurare opiniones. ACcontra D ThO
mashoc rnum inspexie, re PhiloCophiam aduocaret in
oblequium Aidei, de illius sequaxeller, non in Deum
rebellis. Ideo has de mareriâ opiniones securus est; nam
si eius actualicarem aureas. E relis accidencia imme-
diare recipere, occludis riam ad generationem lubltan-
cialem, ac Cubinde ad anima rarionalis cum CorpOre
rnionem (ubltancialem, FTInC CFOO BAECE, PetrUM, dunL
rulrenebras offundere nostrae schoix, maxima illi