# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0532
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0532?run=74
# Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4)
# Folio 472, page id 167783496X:0532
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=532
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000532.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

C1B. TI. SECF. FI.
anima homn en traduce vi seminis propasetur, sine
dubio esset vegenerabilis, ita corruptibilis.
Ouid damnas in hac altertione Cani. Non ne rerz;
Nonne cacholica est? Cur ergo invereis eius verbas
Appono, dices Forre, aquivalentia. Bene est, exprello
Auchorum verba, non erane laris opportuna calumniis,
oporcuic noua arre illos laceltere, nempe aequivaleneia
verborum: hac est nuperaars, ignora luperioribus (X-
culis, quam nostrum peperir, et qua pucalti riendum
in nolEros Authores, quia eorum verbis expressis nul-
lam poreras imporrare calumniam, quam pura quae
probaca est Dominicanorum in Sanctos Parres reue-
sentia, quandoquidem illius laelae non poruisti vel mi-
nimam nobis suspicionem constare, nisi cua verba
appoluises.
PAR A GR A PHYS SECYNDVS.
indicatus Bannes, e detoria in AduerCarium
accusario.
Ademsinceritare, Ceu maiori audacia, ne dicam
maliria, agiscum Bannes. Primo pucas bla sphemal.
Te; quod dixerie r. P2F. 9. 1- acc. 8. Plurimos Sanctorum
Fuiste magis Placonicos, quam Peripatericos, e aliquos
illorum aliguando erraste in his eriam quae pertinent ad
Fdem. Ec quid Vis ne infallibiles fuisse: Vilne Crpriani
anabaprimum detendere: Vel negas aliquor illorum
Fuisse ATillenarios:
Nelcio unde hauleris secundam proposirionem,
quam ex Bannes citas quaelt. 23. arc. 5. circa sccundam,
e quartam conclusionem. Vix poltum, vel rnum ver-
bum reperire, nisi iltud, hac sententia Augustini non
modicam habem dissicultarem, rbi aurem Gur, qua 2d.
iungis, debebas annorare, ne nos corgueres indagine
verborum, ex quibus forte sciunctis contecisti propoh.
rionem, quam rocabis aequivalencem sensui Bannetis
illa aurem dubio affere quinque modos explicandi D.
Auoustinum, ec cum paulo differas à Cenrenria D. Thon
mae, istimasis adharet.
e