# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0587 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167783496X:0587?run=74 # Title: [Libri Quinque Apologetici Pro Religione, Utraque Theologia, Moribus, Ac Iuribus Ordinis Praedicatorum. Adversus Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ...] Libri Qvinqve Apologetici Pro Religione, Vtraqve Theologia, Moribvs, Ac Ivribvs Ordinis Prædicatorvm. Adversvs Theophili Raynavdi Tres, totidem Petri de Alua libros, aliquot Epistolas Ioa. Launoij, Expostulationes Carterij, aliosque: ... (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:4) # Folio 527, page id 167783496X:0587 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167783496X&page=587 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167783496X/jpgs/default/00000587.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. RETRAOT. DE LATRE NTDARD. plicatius e concradictorium magis, quam ab omnium cerrissimo supra prima principia allerisu, non nis pro- olemaricum proficilci iudicium, quod laiua Constieu- tione Ponciticia assereorium cancum iudicium retante. dammeneur qui ScOrO nOn AHentiunEuE 3 Sed praecer hoc argumentum non leue à Aylo Schola nuserrimae, aliud Cupperic lonse grauius a lentu serip- cionis e insticuro: nam huiussibelli, si vilus fuie, Au- xhorisrna videcurmens esse, bonam sdem à locietare humana et Ecclesaltica prorsus ableoare, illique dolos e Frandes Cufficere, aequissimas principum, ee Ponti- ticum lanctissimas leges, pudendis, nedum inepris ec cidiculis, Ced eriam negnistimis interprecacionibus COr- rumpere; ve quisquis libelli, si exrec, Auchor est, bellum indicere videatur probicaci et humanita- ei, e pertidiam invehere fucaram aliqua subcilicaris _ pieraris specie re sit derectabilior. Ouis enim illosfe. rac, qui fcedera, pacta lincere incunda, qui leges dininas _ Ecclelasticas huin(modi corrupcelis sibi permirrac in- verrere; re E quid pollicitus sic, aur iurarie ex animo, in prompru, dissoluendo promisso ec pacto habeat distin- ctionem, se problemarice, non alterrine locurum: quam- vis sublic iuramento cognicio cerrior quolibet principio Physico, Mecaphysico, auc per se noro: Ouis sibi non magis abhac distinctione rimeat, quam a pelte aut quo uis veneno pexsentissimo? Ec ne quis rei per se innoxix credar, tor malorum me invidiam importare, re oblique illius Authorem eradu- cam, paucis demonstro nullo carere riciorum genere. Omnia ab inscitia, ab improbitace, ee ranitare meneis prodcune, relur a exiplici aririne. Elinc roridem Audia diversa anriguorum, Thimonis Acheniensis coono- mento oloris hominum, omnes rninerlm exeCTAMEIS. quod mulca per summam iniquirarem Aagiciosisima Perpetrent; Democriri risu ee cachinnis res humana infectantis, quali inanissimas ee a ranitare profectas: e Hleracliri ricam hominum perperuo Aecu prolequen- ris, quod inscitia miseronda caeci in omne errorum et Aaritiorum oenus nos praecipices daremus. Ccrcissimum est eam ex landabilicare oradationem cerricudinis, ad- juncta distinctione, aferriue ac problemarice dicti et