# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1677996064:0157
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1677996064:0157?run=74
# Title: [Continens Declarationem Dialecticae P. Rami facilem, & expeditam adhibitis una praeceptis & regulis D. Philippi Melanchthonis] Continens Declaratio-||nem Dialecticæ P. Rami facilem, & ex-||peditam adhibitis vnà præceptis & regu-||lis D. Philippi Melanchthonis|| (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 141, Stück 3; Leibn. Marg. 141)
# Folio 154, page id 1677996064:0157
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1677996064&page=157
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1677996064/jpgs/default/00000157.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.87
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

IsA PRACEPTA AF DECLARAF.
nem Philippitriplisem, causalem scilicet, par-
cialem, e accidencalem, quarum prima
constituirur ex causis omnibusrel aliqui-
bus; secunda ex distriburione elticerria ex
adiunctis. et sex nocarione quoque est definitio
nominis definitio eodem reuocabitur. POL. Cam-
modeid fieri pocest. Sed camen in parriali, vide ne
distribuas cum sit definiendum. Nam non est defi-
nicio cum disis, peenisentia continet duas partes,
dumper  concritionem es sidem, nisi aliter enuncies. PH.
Ouomodo P P O L. Peenitentia est doctrina quae
constat concritione es fide: seu quo allo commode
vtaris genere. P E. Cum itaque dico Dialectica
constat exinventione es iudicio, non est definitio;
sed cum dico, Dialectica est ars quae constat ex illis?
POL. Bene. In generibus paulo diverla
esrario. Nam hicnon licet diuidere, quia
generis dehinitio scortim tora deber lin-
gulis apra esse speciebus. Itaqe non recte de-
finis anemal, quod sic corpus animatum constans
bestia es homine. Nam haec definitio non est tota
vera de speciebus seorsim. P H. Mones egregie. Si
Ramum sequar, possumne ex omni priore argu
mento definitiones extruere; etiam si unicum so-
Jam consulam? POL. Potes, sed oportet runc areu-
menta propria esse. Moneo quod ex causss
Ainalibus, ex nocatione, exeffectis, (ub-
iectis, adiunetis; incepro de membris,
ex ex coniusaris, probabilissima ducan-
rUE.
 Cotot
Corssali
desimotio.
e definitio
eC HO est
asito
58C5.
desinitiones
faeciles ex
oecibsce.
1