# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167915642X:0072
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167915642X:0072?run=74
# Title: [Qua Divi Thomae Vera mens de singulis vitae humanae & Christianae officiis inter rigidas & laxiores opiniones media defenditur] Qva Divi Thomæ Vera mens de singulis vitæ humanæ & Christianæ officiis inter rigidas & laxiores opiniones media defenditur (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:2)
# Folio 24, page id 167915642X:0072
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167915642X&page=72
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167915642X/jpgs/default/00000072.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 44 lines, status machine
# Lines: 44 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

e4
I5P
E. SECT. F
axprehendi sine assensu. Ideo, inquic Scorus, contraria
opiniones postunt esse inmente apprehendente, non iu-
dicance. Fodem 5. Tr. Occupat relponsionem aduerlario-
rum, contradictoria non esse quidem absolure reca in
se, led collaca ad nOS, quia VeTa APPATENE: CONtra
ille instac, reritas rerum polica est in convenientiâ ad
luum exemplar, e ad ideam diminam, vel est ip (aMCELCS
ve relucet in incellectione dinina (ui cauSa: AF certum eAt.
veram que partem concradictionis non esse determinare
veram in ideis, ec rationibus aerernis: Frgo nec porelt
rila rarione, a nobis reraque pars concipi, ee indicari
reta. sed ad summum illarum altera disunctiue.
Idem argumentum Contirmat 5. T2. Non minus repu-
gnac, propolitiones contradictorias de moralibus, simul
veras esse, sculicitas e non licitas, quam de rebus ad
speculationem pertinentibus: Acqui iltarum rerique re
puonat reritarem inesse; re probae Scorus ex Arist. 4. MC
caph. rbi contra Prrasoraeos asserentes quaecunque appa-
rent esse rera, arguit PhiloCophus: R ica sic, contradicto-
ria simul Fore vera; quia pluribus diverla opinancibus, 
quiliber rerum assequatur, idem erie simul recum de Fal
Cum coniunctim aur dinisim. Probat vero primam pro-
Politionem ex eodem Scoro. Veritas cuinscunque conclu-
honis seu moralis sen speculariux continerur principus
vnde deducitur; e C illa sine Cubalterna Peu subordinata, re-
Feruntur candem ad rrum primum principium e imme-
diarum, cuius veriras, de recticuido elt per le noca vel à
Peacepto divino, quale est istud non licet subripore rem
alienam inuito Domino, illud vero principiumnon pocest
contipere recam que concradictionis partem, nempe rem
ad subripientem iure perrinere de non perrinere.
Secundum argumencum mulco rberius ee eleganrius
prolequitur per plures parascaphos cuius summam hac
torma propono: simens eodem aur diverlo indicio practi
co pollit assentiri verique. parri contradictoriae re rectae de
licita, sequicur consticuendam esse quintam conscientiam,
qua omnia dubia practica dirimar his duobus est (5 non
est, ea vero conscientia noua elt, inaudita, repugNaNS, _
diverla à quacunque alia conscienrix specie, ergo cum
eor ritiis scateat est ommino abiicienda. Primam arou-
menci propolcionem explicat 5. 7. e probarionem iat