# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167915642X:0305 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/167915642X:0305?run=74 # Title: [Qua Divi Thomae Vera mens de singulis vitae humanae & Christianae officiis inter rigidas & laxiores opiniones media defenditur] Qva Divi Thomæ Vera mens de singulis vitæ humanæ & Christianæ officiis inter rigidas & laxiores opiniones media defenditur (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:2) # Folio 257, page id 167915642X:0305 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=167915642X&page=305 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/167915642X/jpgs/default/00000305.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine # Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.92 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. DEFENSIO EVCHARISEIES lua ingenua confestione, nullas Regi ob canemc Xiudicibus proprer homicidium, aur iniustas poenas da: curume Dices camdem regulam probabilitatum seguutos, ma- nere aliud Dei, aliud hominum iudicium. Sed quaero. vnderibi constet, hoc iudiciorum diserimen? PE A PEO- babilitatum reoulas, semoro dubio, iuste puniane Prin- Cipes e Judices, de ab illo exigane paenas caedis, de homi- cidii, quod dubitabat secururum, nec curavie deuitare; inde cerriorem me Facies hunC DCUM abIOIUTuTUM: ABGE e meam salurem, adeo remerariis consiliis se magistris Permiccam. Amadxus vbique sui similis praecipicem consiliarium asic, e Dominicanorum demoxlorem. Huc aduocat in- tempeltiue omnino, quaestionem srauistimam, de ance Concilium Fridentinum ambiguam, de in medio reli- tam, an peccaci morcalis conseins possit Fucharistiam lumere pracermissâ confessione, sed verà concricione prauiâ, cuius se credar cerriorem. Agnoleis Lector, hanc dissicultarem alienam esse a subiecta propolitione de pec- Cacis dubiis consirendis; camen huc aduOCaE, VE CaFPAE C a- serani opinionem, qui ance definicionem Frid. 13. Sestonc, Contestionem Sacramentale Fucharistia negaVeTACPEX- uerendam esse omnibus, qui conscientiâ Deccari OE- calis frauantur: Tra sen serat Cajecanus, ve iam insinuarum eC, nec tamen Concilium ejus opinionem damnauie re laerericam; Ced re a periculosà nos cauere iusIE, SICUL te- Tacur Cano lib. 5. Cap. 5. quaest. 4. qui Concilio incertuic, e Mazna eriam pars fuic. Ouare comiria nostra generalia insulari decrero prohibene, ne quis nostrium opinionem anc detendar expunctam e libris Cajecani ab Inquisi. lone Hispana. Sed hoc parers on altuit Amadaeus (uX 3. Propolicioni, cui nulla intercedic cognatio, cum alcera, de concriro peccarimortalis, Cumenre Fucharistiam, Con- ellione non prauia, ec dilacâ spe Contellarii masis idonei: aec enim omnia opponebat Cajeranus, quae eius laplur Acutanca