# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1684860695:0449
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1684860695:0449?run=74
# Title: [Duo Postremi Apologiae Libri] Dvo Postremi Apologiæ Libri (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 210:5)
# Folio 429, page id 1684860695:0449
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1684860695&page=449
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1684860695/jpgs/default/00000449.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine
# Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

TN XRIPLTCIS BEHERIS LAVNOTE LAPSUS: q2y
re; pucacenim, lesem diuidi, in dirigencem, et co-
sencem; quali genus in duas species, cum camen acce-
datad illam, quam rocane divisionem subiecti in acciu
denria, de eiu sdem legis, duo gnasi inada quata MUnCTZ
sponiticet. Lesis enim est, lucere de impellere, e ideo
sorpeii lesem ee prouidentiam aerernam delineabane
sceprro ocularo; quia vim lucendi de imperandi habec.
Ercum Capiencia increaca nomen dexis obrincac, non
carer vi dirisendi Deum, Tua enim Capientia est sbi lex
Hac dixerim, ve retellam, quod in me norac Launoius,
meiuuenilirer exultare, his verbis divini (5) Fcde pastici
duris leses directione in authores, coactione in subditos
aecre. Duod putat dictum in Dei e Christi dedecuss
Ouare, inquit, Baronis propositionem hanc non noto; quia
graniter norandam se omnibus exhiber: calefacto cerebro-
Es inconsiderate scribit, ut vericarem occultet, non v+ pa-
refaciat, ne patefacta suis, eo curia cui sernit, placitis re-
gagnet. Nonne miraris Lector, hanc Thrasonicam dis-
purandi rarionem. Sac fuerie calumniam ex insciria na-
camaperuisse. Cerrum est Deum ex Tua lapienriq sitii
lerem esse quo ad rim dirisendi: sed de lege multa dif-
putara sune accurare, secunda parre nostrae ettrices, quae
huius nostrae responsionis brenitarem compenlare pos
TinE.
Verno verbo conrelta in Caieranum argumenta dis.
pellam; cerrum est leges Canonicas eodem loco in
Ecclesia, quo civiles in Republica et regno reponi: co-
dem etiam gradu Summos Pontitices Ecclesia, quo
Reres huis reonis prxesse. Si ica sc, velim relpondeat
Launoius; an Reges lesibus cinilibus Cabiiciat; quoad
veramque vim dixigendi de poenis cogendi; I vix au(IE
hoctentare. Sed supremos principes obnoxios legum
directioni, a coactione, et Poenis eximat, hoc exemplo
agnoscer non adeo ablurdam esse Caierani sententiam,
quod Summis Poncificibus indulocac, immunicarem,
quam non auderer Resibus negare, nili vellet odio
Summorum Ponciticum Reges in Ordinem cogere.
Hic plane rsurpanda mihi sunt quae cibi assumplicti ver
baHlierourmi, quocumqueieris, ant pariter in lutohare-
bimus, aut parites expediemur; de quod in Caieranum
e Bellarminum, Summos Pontitices ab Bcclesiactici