# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1685116701:0122
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1685116701:0122?run=74
# Title: Philanthon Vindicatus Sive Hermannus Conringius Ob Andabaticam suam anno 1677. Helmstadii editam Discussionem, Praetensamq[ue] pag. 329. Demonstrationem Iuste, sed tamen misericorditer Castigatus (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 204)
# Folio 118, page id 1685116701:0122
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1685116701&page=122
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1685116701/jpgs/default/00000122.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

12C
Conrinoius
ce Anactasius Biblioeh. Oua enim, inquie, super vene-
au add. tudilium imazinum adoratione praesens sinodus docet, haec es Aposto-
Nic. 2. lica Sedes antiquitistenuit, e universalis Ecclessa semper venerata est,
ex BactenS VenCrAtur OUIBIISDAM DUNZAXAT GALLORUM eX
ceptis. Ii vero, uc ex jam dictis patee, vel spirieu vertioi
nis agebaneur inlani; vel imagines adoracione formali, in
Per, es propter se, tanquam Deiticam Prinitatem a C acholicis
adorari rebantur iniquis vel deniq; circa pugnas verborum
languentes in concipiendi loquendiqs modo, cui percina-
cius pars ueraq;e inhraerebat, a ceceris erane diverlis de ipsa
verore non dissencientes; id quod in plerisq; Scholasticoru
disputacionibus usu venic. F∞o Cane (Calro meliore judi-
cio) non primum, Ced duohaecce posteriora de ipss credo;
F0. 4. Bion Cinm iple sonas Aurelianen(is l. P. adr. C lauct. l’aur. longe
PP. Par. Polmed. de Crucis cimasinum reneracione doctrinam
qq S. Cregorii (cuius intra limites sese continuie d Adria-
3)L.C. nUS T.) laudet, extollat recipiarque; uc proinde (ni Fallor)
e iplenonnis Logomachum agac, et per logonachiam in
aliquibus impuonetur. Ouidquid vero sic huius, certe
Farsum est 90. Ouod in Calliam ulcimis demum se
culis, intra annos nimirum 400, circiter, primum deve-
nerit omnis imaginum adoratio. Patet id imprimis ex A-
nactasio jam nunc cicato. Si vero quibusdam duntaxat Callorum
ab Inconoclastis quid labis achaelerie, mirandum non est;
cum legatio illa, quam pro contoderatione Pipini Regis
impetranda C onstantinus Imporacor milerat in Franciam,
muneribus horum animos Facile captirarie.
Deinde illa omnia, quae supra de Dipino Clementem
 Albertum (Adelbertum) paenis sibjiciente; de Carolo
MI. Ludorico Pio, et Synodo Francot. esimus, ConcernunE
tam Callos, quam Germanos.
Achac S. Crucis Crueifixique imarines Gallia (UE CK
bid col. dictis parec) Imperatorum iltorum cemporibus ciera con-
5I. D. erorerlia adoraric. adco, uc ipsemet sonas lOcOcIt. C lau.
diu
In praefat.
P. 1137