# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1815018577:0016
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1815018577:0016?run=74
# Title: [Schediasma. Polemicum. Expendens. Quaestionem. An. Dentur. Spectra. Magi. Et. Sagae] Schediasma. Polemicum. Expendens. Quæstionem. An. Dentur. Spectra. Magi. Et. Sagæ. (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 5)
# Folio 10, page id 1815018577:0016
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=1815018577&page=16
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/1815018577/jpgs/default/00000016.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

H (10)
porum immacerialis est, participat tamen de autractu maceriae, es saudium
ac dolorem sentit, dependet intuiru operationum a mutationibus materiae in
corpore humano, adharet quasi aliis corporibus terrenis, nec fine illis unionem
suam cum corpore humano continuare potest. In Tractatu autem Germa
nico, qui Bersuch vom Besen des Ceistes inscribitur, c. 4. 5. 56. P. 70.
hanc spiritus hujus definitionem proxonit: Der Beist ist eine sira(E, Dad
ist, ein Ding, Welches obne 3uthun der Deaterie bestehentans in welchem
alle materialische Dinge bemeget verdens uno welcheo auch diesen die De
eguns giebets pe aussvannet, vereiniget, zusammendrucet anziehetivon
Sieh) Rossec exleuchtet erwarmes, Faltetsdurchoringetiuno ihr die gehorise
Bestale giebet; cui addi potelt 5. 26. p. 63. 65c. 7. 8. 14. p. 134. _ AIncerus
veritatis indasator contra Dn. TToffmannum anth. 16. 23. 6524. Jam re-
r0 ex hac delinitione patet: 1) Spiritum hunc immaterialem operariim
materiam. Atqui hoc est, quod Philosophix corpuscularis sectatores de
Carteliani quaerunt, quomodo id fieri, de Spiritus de altractu materia
Participare possit. In desinitionibus allatis hujus rei nulla affertue
causa aut probabilis ratio, quod tamen, quomodo seil. id Aeri possit, ex
plicare conantur Cartessani. Ouare hi ab iplishoc non mutuetur, sedne-
Detur, nesandum quoque erit, Spiritum hunc immaterialem opcrari pos.
se inmateriam; aut, linon negetur, (quod tamen necestarium esse dicit
celeberrimus Autor, dum 5. 7. Superius allegatimens eo tendit, possibile
non esse, ut asseclae Philolophia C orpuscularis et Mechanicae serio a Becke
reprincipiis ex conclusionibus dissentiant, nullam aliam, uti videtur, ob
caulam, quam quod modum operationum Spiritus in materiam illi aperi-
ee non valeant,) obscurissima d incertissima cuncta, proutantea, mane.
bunt, nisi in una roce Spiritus omnia explicata credere velimus, quod Phi-
lolophorum nemo concedere potest. 2) Si Spiritus hic aque ac reli-
quorum corporum immaterialis est, saudium ex dolorem lentit, sequetur,
omnibus corporibus, quibus hic Spiritus inest, sensum inesse, quod Cam-
Panella Catuit, de secundum Buddaum in Philo (ophia inscrumentali c. 1. 5.
14. P. 80. in eorum partes tendit, qui animum mundi alleruerunt; vel et
nam sequetur, cognitionem ec appeticum plantis ee corporibus inanimatis
concedendum elle, quod etiam Aacuere ridetur Vir celeberrimus, qui inr
ersuch 2C.C. 7. Th. 26. p. 250. non modo aëri tres animae sensitira Faculta-
tess sentire: locomoreri, deliderare, tribuit, rerum etiam p. 152. d. 27. C.7.
_ in scripto contraDn. Flofmannum anth. 38. _ 40. Spiritui mundi uni
versali intellectum ee voluntatem adseribit. Sed contra hos Joh. C lau-
ber