# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181507888X:0016
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181507888X:0016?run=74
# Title: Friderici Hoffmanni Ad Celeberrimi cuiusdam Viri Fundatoris Novae Philosophiae Spiritualis Scriptum brevis & modesta responsio cum Vindicatione Philosophiae experimentalis mechanicae (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 7)
# Folio - , page id 181507888X:0016
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=181507888X&page=16
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/181507888X/jpgs/default/00000018.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine
# Lines: 31 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

endipertinet ad spiritu, sequitur quod actionesmedicamento.
rum, dum caletaciune, resolvune, ludorem pellunt, humores
congulant de uniune, deducendae sint a spiritu. Pocterius est
ablurdum, quia modum operandi e agendi medicamento-
rum exactissime demonstrare polsums ex materixe varia di-
spolitione, magnicudine tigura cexturaF. _ prius erit ablurdum.
Porro, li actiones omnes a spiritu enent, lequeretur, omnes
causas morbolas esse spirituolas, e luam actiritarem habere
a spiritu, de quoniam diverlissimae sunt illa caulae, diversissimi
etiam essent spiritus. Posterius est absurdum F. d prius.
IV. Scribit, Spiritum, qui in reliquis creaturis es in homi-
ne tantum erodu differt, constare ex amore es lumine; A
morem autem in crearuris dicie simpathiam de lumen instin-
ctum naturalem. Ouaeritur hic, an illa, qua tantum gradu difte.
runt etiam essentia differant? linon, (piritus creaturarum, eriam
CRecimmotalisnon secus acanima rationalis hominis, de crea
curae, lapides, metalla essent qualimentes corporea. Duod acti.
nec simphatiam es antipathiam supra jam responsum) dedimus,
haec enim mera lunt cerebritiomenta.
V. Si motus omnis a spiritu est, uti est s spiritus est ens a
etivum uniens materiam ab intra, unio autem sine attractione
concipi nequit, sequiim omnino, attractionem aque competere
spiritibus ac pulsionem; Jamquaro, annon omnis actio, quae di
citur actractio tiat uncis vel hamulis? de annon putat, illam
tractionem etiam speciem esse pulsionis? quiain omni pullio
ne corpus impellendum deber esse antrorlum constitutum,
Pellensaurem retrortum, hinc nulla datur accractio in rerum
natura, aut concipere aliquam V. C. pocest, ubipellens antror.
cum, pellendum aurem recrorium? adeoque.
Ouodcunque nec concipi potest, nec demonstrari,
 t