# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0012
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0012?run=74
# Title: Philosophiae Cartesianae adversus Censuram Petri Danielis Huetii Vindicatio (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 9)
# Folio 8, page id 181508023X:0012
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=181508023X&page=12
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/181508023X/jpgs/default/00000014.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

CAPUT PRIWUM.
rum ex prortus ambisere. Lcagre Anci. Cartehani Cartelium Faxan-
tes proceres luos iplosmet damnant.
5. 8. TIac tamen dubicacio non est extenla penitus ad uni.
verlasres; Ced duncaxat ad eas omnes, in gribus relminimam incer-
ticudinis Cuspicionem reperiemus. vid. 5. 1. P art. 2. Orare omnino
hic eximuneur immediace a mence nostra percepta de cogitata, vid.
5. 9. Part. 2. Hlinc mines verum perhibuisse celtimonium judican-
dus est D. Huecius in s. Puis IV. _V. C ap. I.
5. 9. Ulcimo haec dubicatio non obtinet nomen Fundamenti
Philolophix Cartehianae ita, ut finis ejus st dubitatio; led quod ad-
hibeatur in Mechodo veritatis; Philosophiex renanda. vid. 5. 1.
Part. I.
Dr. TI. Cur in dubitatione Philosophia suxe
Fundamentum poluerit C artelius?
5. T. Rationes, ob quas hanc dubicationem in locum funda-
menti ascirerie Cartehius, Cunt in propaculo eaegrenon unx. Nam
dubitarit (1) ut sele redderet immunem a praeconceptis opinionibus;
uepoce grarum ris tanta est, ut nobis perlradeat ca, qua post agni
tam veritatem (aepiuscule nos rubore perfundune. Manifectum in
exemplum abic mocus chrli ex inceltinis pervenas melaraicas fir-
missime ab Anacomicis ance ACellium (qridquid etiam in concrarium
sentiac Toh. Nardius in noct. Genial. IV. p. 272.) creditus. Ipscolim
omnino arbitrabar, aurum penitus depurari ab aliis metallis supee
cupella in Furno probatorio. Oriarem ita eram cdoctus: AA gron-
dam cale aurum dissolvens erentum experiebar Falsissimum, quo
vila mox apertissimas erroris mei agnori caulasnon sine indigna-
tioneatqrepudore. Fujus Farina exempla plura, tantum non in-
finica ferme, huc accerlere est in Facili.
5. 2. Segrucus durem est noster Philolophus rursus vestigia
Aristocelis in tocoTII. Libr. Mecaph. Texcibus primis Lib. IV. Phys. _
palsim; qui dubicarit do recerum Philolophorum sententiis, ut veram
inveniret. vid. Soner. C. l.
5. 3. (2) Oria sentus nostri solo corpore exerciti nobis lape-
numero imponere contreverunt. vid. 5. 3. 659. Part. 1. Qrastalla-
CiaS
2d5. 20