# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0034
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0034?run=74
# Title: Philosophiae Cartesianae adversus Censuram Petri Danielis Huetii Vindicatio (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 9)
# Folio 30, page id 181508023X:0034
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=181508023X&page=34
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/181508023X/jpgs/default/00000036.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

CAPUT YERTIUM.
vid. Willis. de anima brucorum. Accedit, quod haec sit doctrina Arist.
vid. Phom. Praefat. 67. tocam. Uc proinde haec sententia ita plane non
sc respuenda. Mencis autem roce ucitur prae animae Permino, vid.
Epist. LXVII. Part. 2. Pa8. 188. (5 Defin. Y, I. Tr. de Ration. Dei existen-
tiam probancibus p. m. 86. Idqre ideo. Oriamens actributa legitur
apud PhiloCophos Coli animae humanae racionali jam olim anre Arist.
ab Hippocc. rid. Aphor. b. Sect. 2. Quicunque aliqua corporis parte do-
lentes plerumque dolores non sentiunt, his mens aegrocat. Ic. Lib. de
Cord. SSc. Anima aucemticulus paltim tam a prilcis, quam recen-
cibus, iisgre Theolosis ec Philolophis, tribuitur etiam brutorum prin-
cipiis vicalibus.
5. 2. Fancmentem ut definiat, dicit esse substantiam cogiran-
cem. Oroinnezotio loco differentix utitur vel Differentia speciti-
ca, vel Proprio qrarti modi; sigridem so cositare semper, Toli et
omni compecitmenci. In qua doctrina ex Philosophis Christianis
non Facile deprehenderis contradicentem.
5. 3. Oraeras, gramobrem Carresrus in detinienda anima seces-
Cum Fecerit a dogmare communi Philo(ophorum animam per spiritum
detiniencium? In prompeu caula cA: Spiricus dicitur eble immate.
rialis substantia. Fnimrero haec differentia consistie in nuda negatio-
nc. Nam 3o immateriale signiticat idem, quod non maceriale. Jam
vero qualis, quaelo, est Definicio negatira: cum bona Detinitio juxta
Aristot. exponat, qrid ressIc. Salse irridec tales Detinitiones negati-
ras Marcus Marci in praesat. ad Philos. Vet. restitur. Siquis, inquiens,
exmepetat, quid sit laxis Philosophorum; es ego respondeam, non esse
lapidem molarem, nequecorem, nequemarmor, neque magnetem, ne-
queunum ex preciosis; parum sane proficiet ex his ad sciendum quid sit
lapis Philosophorum? Ulcerius si animus eslet definire lupum per
canem non domesticum, quis inde addiscet, utrum in Cylris degac, u-
trum SIECaPAXBEC:
5. 4. Reseris, eo ipso, dum remoreo alias species coordina-
ta5, unam exprimo, v. 8. Seqraerenci, quisnam Eranselictarum EV-
angelium ordiatur his verbis: In principio erat verbum (sc: respon-
dero, non Macthaus, neqre Lucas, negreMtarcus. Nonnereddor
cerrior Johannis? AI haec non est Definicio; sed nuda graedam de-
nominatio. Qrae locum invenit ibi, ubi omnes species coordinata
omni-