# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0035 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0035?run=74 # Title: Philosophiae Cartesianae adversus Censuram Petri Danielis Huetii Vindicatio (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 9) # Folio 31, page id 181508023X:0035 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=181508023X&page=35 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/181508023X/jpgs/default/00000037.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine # Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. CADUT LLALLCM. omnibus unc perspecta, sic V. 8. Si mihi ex Iristoria animalium co- enica estnacura ferarum dc domesticarum bectiarum, omnino lupum vocans canem non domelticum, tacicc exprimo canemferum. Spc. ciebus rero coordinatis mihinon agrecognicis, per solam negatio. nem alterius alterum minime sentium expono. Id qrodiplum ica Tesehabet in re substantia materiali de immateriali. Nam macorialis eA extenta, habetqre partes exera partes, ec cAparcibilis in Partes. Immaterialis rerohis desticuitur proprietatibus. 5. 5. Itaqre Carcelius utus est in Definitione animae termino po- Stiro, e quidem desumpro à Proprio quartimodi. Oraleproprium in Philolophia Aristocelica semper occupat locum Differencia speci ficxe, häc ignorata. Ouo pacto prostat apud eosdem Philo(ophos Detinicio animalis, animal est corpus vivum, sentiens; it. hominis, homo est animal rationate. 5. 6. Tlanc Detinitionem dicit cogniru esse Facillimam. Oria juxta luperius demonstrata corpus nostrum non nisi ver senlus corpo. reos, deceptioni obnoxios, percipimus absque cooperatione sensu- um: Echaec est unica, cagrehactenus inconcussa ratio, quamobrem mencem nobis prius infallibiliter quam corpus innotelcere docuerit C axtesius. 5. 7. Objicis de novo, mentem, qra calem, nungram posse le iplam agnolcere. Alias namqre aseret aliqrid in scipsum, quod essecablurdum. Fnimrero ideo Christianus hic PhiloCophus 5. 11. (5 22. Part. 1. alteruit, progisni in nobis nociciam mentis ex ejus affe- etionibus. Ex qribus prima opcrationes (unt cositationes, quarum numero (unt tot, grocin nobis foremus, concipimus aue formamus terum ideas. Dum nimirum nungram res ut objectum cognoscibile Potest cositari absgre mente. Hlaec vero optime absque re externa C. LI. An hanc sententiam Carteli retellere DOF Ad 5. 4 sit doctrina Fpicurea Racuens animam huma- naM COrpOTCaME S. I. Pro responsione norecur, Cententiam Cartesri non ita elle accommandam Philosophix Epicurexe, ne illa cradat huic confor- mis, Seduc Epicurea per Carcelianam penitus reddatur clumbis. Ica- 2 oEla