# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0041 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0041?run=74 # Title: Philosophiae Cartesianae adversus Censuram Petri Danielis Huetii Vindicatio (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 9) # Folio 39, page id 181508023X:0041 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=181508023X&page=41 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/181508023X/jpgs/default/00000043.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine # Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. CAPUT QVARTUIM. celiideas easdem reputat cum Platonis, vid. Vol. de sect. Pbilos. 5. 11. P. 69. Diosen. Laerr. de vitis Philos. lib. 3. P. m. 232. d Thomal. Orat. XTIT. P. 294. 65 sequ. Facie intelligendo, uc neutras intollisat. 50- lacio interim nostro Philo(opho lunc eadem Fata, quae perpellae sune idex opcratrices Marci Marci; qrippe quae Philolophis multis Polo nomine consultis videbantur Platonica. Ias vero Polidiores vin- dicare nulli dubitarune. Uude e Kircherus Marcum Marci est afta- EuS: Mi Domine Marci, quam pauci incelligunt hasideas ? VII. An in Conario vel glandula pincali ad5. 10. praecipua sit sedes animae3 S. 1. Presacur cum Domino Hluecio. Oroniam autem utus Elandularum tunc cemporis ob experimenta Anacomica rariora non adeo fuit exploratus. Hloc in passu Carresius aliquid humani pactus est, reniamgre apud benerolos meretur. vid. Fpistol. L. Part. YL. demesto judicium demoru cordis ee Cansrinis Carrel. OAPUT OOVARTUIM. Expenditur C arcelni sententia de Exictentia DFI. I. Quae sit sententia Carresit de Dei existentia: II. Qua sit Carte sit opinio de idea rei infinitae (5 summe perfecta, qua in nobis est? III. An idea rei insinita C5 summe perfecta, quae innobis est, sit finita s imperfecta? IV. An finitum ccgno- Scatur ex insinito, an vero hoc exillo? V. Anidearei infini- ta C5 summe perfectae, quae in nobis est, sit clara (5 distincta: VI. an idea rei insinita es summe perfecta, quae in nobis est, aliunde proficisci possit, quam a re insinita C5 summe perfecta: VII. Anrealitas objectiva, quae est in idea rei infinitae C5 sum- me perfectae, tota sit a mente nostra? VIII. An exidea rei in finita es summe perfecta, quae in nobis est, necessario sequatur, rem illam infinitam es summe perfectam extramentem nostram extares