# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0059
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/181508023X:0059?run=74
# Title: Philosophiae Cartesianae adversus Censuram Petri Danielis Huetii Vindicatio (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 223, Stück 9)
# Folio 59, page id 181508023X:0059
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=181508023X&page=59
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/181508023X/jpgs/default/00000061.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

CAPUZ OCTAVUM.
rarentur quaedam corporatamminuta, uesensum effucerent; quae va
rias magnicudines, ficuras es motus habere diverentur; quianemo por:
est dubitare, quinmulta reveraralia sine, ut modo ostensum est. Sed
rejecta est, primo quia illa corpuscula indivisibilia supponebat; quo no-
mine etiam ego illam rejicio: de inde quia vacuum circaipsa esse fingebat )
quod econullum dariposse demonstro: tertio quia cravitatem iisdemt
tribuebat; quam ego nullam in ullo corpore cum solum spectatur, sed
tantum quatenus ab aliorum corporum sunes moru dependei, atque ad
alia refertur intellico. Ac denique quia non ostendebat, quo pactores
singula ex solo corpusculorum concursu orirentur, vel si de aliquibus id
ostenderet, non omnes ejus rationes inter se coharebant; saltem quani-
tum judicare licet ex ils, quae de ipsius opinionibus memoriae prodita sunt.
An aurem ea quae hactenus de Philosophia scripst, saris cohareant, aliis
judicandum relinquo.
5. 5. Iliipsi parasraphi luculenter Patis innuunt, quod, utue Car-
celius cum omnibus Philo(ophis tam prileis quam recentioribus, eo-
demi usus sit genere prinicipiorum cognolcendi ac ellondi, nihilominus
multa lumini nacurali magis conrenientia e aperca in mediura pro-
tulerie. Flincqre ejus Philosophia non sic judicanda consarcinata ex
aliorum Philosophorum dogmacibus sinejustissima methodo. Nam
priscos multories candem incendisse metam, v. gr. Aristorelem Auden-
cem DFO indasando per doctrinam mocus corporum naturaliummo-
bilium concinuorum, ultro contiteor; scvero actisisse pernego.
5. 6. Nec penes eruditos in incertis versatne, nostro exsuperio-
rileculo exstitisle viros egregios, qui hos rei Philosophicae defectus
animadrerterint anxiigre fuerine in luggerendis consiliis Scientia-
tum ausendarum rid. Fr. Baco de Verulamio, foh. Baprista van HTol-
mone, Ilustrissimus Robercus Borle in Seriptis luis ingeniolissimis.
5. 7. Quae ommnia (, Lector Benerole, sincero animoperpende-
ris, deprehendes proxgranimitare Tua, qrod risidior rirgula censo.
ria a Domino Fluetio lic exicen (e. Luper (cripta Cartesiana, qrae in plu
rimis minuspenetralle ridetur.
S. 8. Facile qroqre praerideo non defuturos, qui me ex Capice
tertio hujus defenlionis crasisssimorum acculabune errorum Logico.
Tum