# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0024
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0024?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio XVIII, page id 727097563:0024
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=24
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000024.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

TDe DR P F AC F.
tive Property: The instance of Solomon
is not at al tothe purpose; untess ve assertect
three Persons founded upon those different
Relations in his individuat Nature. WVho
denies, that one Person may have different
Respects, and vet be but one Person subsist.
inc: Where doth the Scripture Cav, ThaE
theson ot David, the Father oF Rehobo-
am, and he that procceded trom David
and Bathsheba vere three Persons distin-
enisped by those relatire Properties: But
here lies the foundation of what ve believe
astothe Trinity; ve are assured front Scri
pture, that there are three to whom the di-
vine Nature and Attributes are civen, and
ve are assured both from Scripture and
Reason, that there can be but one divine
Fssence; and therefore every one of these
must havethe divine Nature, and vet that
can be but One. But it is a mest unreasona
ble thine to charee those with Sabellianilm,
who assert, Thac every Person hath thc
divine Nature dictinetly belonsins to him,
and that thc divine Flenco is communi
cared trom the Facher to the; SOn. Did
ever Noetus or Sabellius, or any of their
Follovers speak after this manner: Is the
divine Pssence but a mere Name, or a dit-
ferene relpect onty 10 Mankind: For the
alsertine such relative Persons as have no
ESenee