# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0040
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0040?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio XXXIV, page id 727097563:0040
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=40
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000040.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

TBe P R F F ACF.
Nature, (Which he calls pre ingoru l na
E) Which can acree to none else. And
the main arcument he vent upon vas this,
that untess ve assert a sincular Nature in
the HypoRales, we must say, that the
Wvhole Trinity vas incarnate; as untess there
be a singular humane Nature distinet from
the common, Christ mast assume the Whole
Nature of Mantind. And this argument
from the lucarnation, vas that which made
Rocelin, in the becinnine of the disputine
ACe, A. D. 1093, 1o assert, Thac the
chree Perlons ivere chree chines dictinet
trom cach other, asthree Angels or tliree
Men, because ochermise che incarnation
ofthe second Perion could not be under-
Anicm. Rood, as appears by Anlelmis Fpistles, and
exist. L. 2. his BoolE of the Incarnation written upon
D.
Dende that occasion. But as Antelm seus at
Prinic. Targe, if this argument hold, it must prove
the three Persons not only to be diltinet,
but separate and divided Subllances,
(Which is directly contrary ro this ReW Fx
plication) and ihen there is no avoidine
Tritheim. But to return to Toh. Philo.
Donus, who, saith Nicephorus, divided
the indirisible Nature ot Crod into chrec
Individuals as amonsMen: Which, saith
he, is repugnant to thesense of the Chri-
Rian Church; and he produces the Testi
MOn
_C. C. 3
C. 48.