# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0041
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0041?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio XXXV, page id 727097563:0041
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=41
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000041.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

d
de
it
A
In)
The DR F F AC F.
mony of Gresory Nazianzen acainst il,
and adds, that Leoncius and Georoius
Pilides confured PhiloDonus.
But in that divided time, there vere C. 49.
some called Theodoliani, woho made but
one Nacure and one HyDOctalIS; and so
fell in with the Sabellians; but others held,
Thac there ras one immutable divine
Essence, but cach Perion had a distinct
individual Nacure: Which the rest charced
with Tricheilm. Which consequence they
utterly rejected, because althouch they held
threc distinet Natures, vet they said, They
vere but one Cod, because there ras but
one invariable Divinity in them. Nice.
phorus soith, that Conons Follovers re-
jected Philoponus; but Photius mentions
a conference between Conon and others, a- Phot. Bib-
bout Philoxonus, wherein he defends bim
acainst other Severians. Phorius erants,
that Conon and his Follovers held a con-
Tubstantial Trinier and che Unier ot the
Ciochead, and 10 tar ther ivere Ortho-
dOx: but saith, They evere tar trom il,
erhen ther alterted proxer and peculiar
Substancesto cach Perlon. The difference
lioch. C0d.
betioeen Conon and Philovonus about this Phot. Cod.
point, (for Conon urote acainst Philopo- 28
nus about the Resurrection) scems to have
heen partly in the Doctrine, but chiesty in
XXXV