# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0043
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0043?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio XXXVII, page id 727097563:0043
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=43
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000043.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

The DR FF AC F.
doth assert plainty, that the common Na-
ture is separated from the Individuals, 2n
lia envolce, by a mere act of the Mind;
se that he allon d no individual 2nity in the
divine Nature, but what vas in the several
Persons; as the common Nature of Man is
a Notion of the Mind, as it is abstracted
from the several Individuals, wherein alone
it really subsists; so that here is an apparent
difference between the Doctrine of Jol.
PhiloDonus and the ne Explication, for
herein the most real, essential and indivi-
Sible Onity oF the divine Nature is asser- Modest exa
red; and it is said to be no Species, BC- min. P. 19.
Cau(e IE IS DUE OnC, and so it could not be
condemned in Poli. Philoponus.
2. Wenon come to Abbat Joactum, whose
Doctrine seems to be as much mistahen, as
it is represente d in the Dccrecal, where the
Condemnation of it by the Lateran Coun-
cilus extant. Dut here Lcannot hut observe
what crear Authority these Vnitarians sive
to this Lateran Couneil, as if they had a
Mind to set up Transubstantiacion bV it.
Which they so often parallel with the Trini-
ty. Thence in their late Discourse they
speak of it as che most seneral Couneit Discourseof
Reat and
that vas ever called, and chat Whac W aS Nominat
chere detined, iE Was made Heresie 10 Op. Trinir p. 4.
Pole II. But by their favour, ve neither
DWvn
XX