# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0046
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0046?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio XL, page id 727097563:0046
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=46
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000046.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

The D R F F AC F.
Modest exa. Fitat the eliree Perions are to bc worctrip.
count, elc
Ded wirh a distinet dirine Worcip:
3. Et is charsed upon him, That he cal-
led che Trinity a mere human Invention,
not lo muchi as hnon to any Catholicke
Creed, and direetly contrary tothe Word
Ot 60d. But the Author here charsed,
3. 40. hath made it his business to prove the Do-
ctrine ofrhe Trinity to be grounded on Scri-
pture, and to vindicate it from the Obje-
cions drann fromthence acainst it.
4. One of the main articles of his charee
Brief Ac. Wvas, Thac he made three Spirirs oF ditte-
rent Order and Deoree, thar che Father
13, 45. IS the one only c0d, by wrhich che Son
and Holy Ghost are excluded manifestly
Erom che Onier ofthe Codhead; But the
modestent Person charsed with his FTeresre saith,
The Realon wrhy we must nor Cay chrec
Crod5, i5, becaule there IS but one and
the lame Divinies in them all; and hac
entirely, indivisibls, inseparabls.
But it is said, that althouch there mar be
some differences, vet they arree in asser-
tins. Thac chereare chree dictinet eternal
Spiris or Mindsin che Frinity; and Cre-
nebrard is broueht into the same Fleresie
ththem. Buc Crenebrard with great in-
.2. P. G1. Ration rejects the Doctrine of Valenti
nus Gencilis, hecause he held on nequality
min. P. 20
Brief AC-
count, ecc.
D. 41, 42.
Win. B. 29.
Crenebrard
de Prinie