# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0064
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0064?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio LVIII, page id 727097563:0064
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=64
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000064.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

The DR P F AC P.
20 satissie and convince them; for Y sind they
decline sarine a word aroinst them. In one
place ther compare the atheilt and DC-
ilt rocetber; and very honcaly and like
any conlcientious DeiAts, they impute all
cesteros the Deilm and rios pare ot the Acheilm
Resol. con- ot our AgC to the Docrines ol the Tri
cernine the
Trinity ana NIEY and lncarnation.
encarn. p. 18. Is it possible for Men that live in our
Age 1o sive such an account as this of the
Croth oF Deilm and Atheilm amone us:
Irhat number of Acheilts is there, upon any
ether account than from a looseness of Thinte-
ine and Livine: Where are those Woho be-
lieve 60d 1o be an incomprehensible Beine.
and vet reject the MrAeries Which relate
+o his Beine because they are incomprehen-
sible: Suppose any reject lpiritual Subctance
25 Nonsense and a Contradiction, as ther
do the Triniey on the same Pretences. Is
this a sufficient reason or not: They may tell
them, as ther do us that they can have no
Ideas, no clear and diltinet Perceptions of
immaterial Subctances: W hat ansiver do
they sive in this case. Not a Syllable; al-
retrerof thouch they take notice of it. But Yhope
Lol. P. S. they sive some better satissaction to the DC-
UIE; No, for they say, This IS nOE a placC
1o arque against cither Atheist or Deill.
By no means: some vould say. Theyvere not
sieh Foel sto fall out withtheir Friends. And