# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0095
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0095?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 23, page id 727097563:0095
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=95
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000095.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

the Doctrine of the Frinier.
Predecesors, we ouchero have a partieu-
lar ere co the rule of Faith received by
them, wrhich must be verr ditterent trom
ours, il they Follo the Fbionites, a5 I
doube noc to matre it appear. They Cay,
The Fbionites used onty S. Marthew5 60. ansiver ra
Dr. BUII
spet. But the Christian Church then, and p. 42.
ever Cince, have receir dche Tour Golpels,
as of divine authoritr. Eusebius, onc ot
the most approved Auchors in Antiquier
by our Tnitarians, reckeons up the four
Evancelists and S. Pauls Fpistles, a5 rri-
cines univertally received by the Christi-
an Church; then he mentions lome se
nerally rejected as spurious; and atrer
those wtrich vere doubted, amons rhich
he mentions the Gospel accordine to the
FLebrews, Which the Zevist Christians fol-
lowd. Nor here is an apparent difference
Dut betreen the Cospel accordine 10 the
FTebrews, and S. Macthews 6ospel; 25
much as between a Book receird with.
ont controvertie, and one that ras nOL.
But iE the Cospel accordine to the Tlebrews
vere then achnomledscd to De the true
Cospet ofS. Matthew; ic was impossible a
man ot (o much sense aS Fusebius, Mousd
malse this difference betreen them. BUE
it is worth our observine, irtrat our 2ni-
tarians Cay about this macter. And by
that