# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0114
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0114?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 42, page id 727097563:0114
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=114
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000114.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication of
under Maximinus at Nicomedia; neither
doth he lay the contrarr. Voon which
dearned Men are divided, Whether heper-
Licted in thac opinion Or nOt. Petavius
Tric. L. L. Ind Valesius sire him up; on the other
c4. n. 13. lide Baronius vindicates him, and Caith.
FI. Valeli.
ust Lha
he mifreport of hum came trom his
od. L. P. c. 4. ZCal againA Sabellianism; and that Alex-
Baron. A. ander Wreote that ot him betore his BoolS
vere chroustily examind; chat Athanasi-
us neverjornshim wich Paulus samosate
nus; that the drians never produced his
authoritr in cheir debates, a5 cher vould
have donc, since che Emperors Mother
had built a City in the place wrhere he
sufter d Marerrdom. It cannot be doube.
ed chat che arian Party vould have it be-
tiered chat ther came out ot Lucians
School, a5 appears by Arius his Epiltle
10 Fusebius ot Nicomedia; but on che o.
cher lide, the sreat argument to me is,
Thac this very party ac the Couneil ot
Antioch, produced a Creed, Wrhich they
Caid, Was there Found irritren with Luci-
an s onn hand, Which is directly contrary
ss. C0 the Samosatenim Docrine. NOW, ci-
ther this was erue or False: it it vere
true, then it was Falle chache Was a Sa-
mosarenian; il it vere falle, how camethe
Arian Party to sive it out for true: P.
Specially thole who ralued themlelres For
Comime
LCcaV. de
318. B. 75
RC.