# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0123
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0123?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 51, page id 727097563:0123
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=123
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000123.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

the Doctrine of the Priniey.
(0 unreasonable as Our Dnitarians; FOr
Phorinus alterted the Pre existence OF thC
X5yD aud its inhabitine in Christ fromhis
Conception; Wvherein he difter dFrom Pau-
lus Samosatenus Who alterred it to have
been upon the Merit of his Virtue. In the
Anathemas of the Couneil oF Sirmium a-
sainst Photinus, one is acainst any one thas
asseres that there is one G0d, but depies
TTIlar. de
Synod. p.
Christ to have been the Son of God before 1175. Fdo
aurorids, and that the WVorid was made by Paril.
him in ohedience +0 theWill of the Fa-
rher. Octers, againsthim that asserts that
there was a Delatation of the Divine Sub-
stance to make him the Son of God, Who
ivas a Man born of the Virein Mary; Ihis
appears From Anath. 6, 7, 9. PuFFOGCtLer.
Which is best explained by FTilary himsess Psilar. de
Trinic. 1.
in anoctier place, Where he mentions chis 10, n. 50.
a5 the Phorinian Doctrine, That 60d the
Word did extend himself (0 far, as to inhabit
the person born os the Virein. Thishe
CaIISs a subrle and dancerous Doctrine. And
therein he Pairh Photinus difter d Fromr Sa- Elilar. de
Exirr. 1. 4
bellius; that che lacter denied any diffe. n. 7.
rence betveen Father and Son, but onty in
Names; Dur l’Borinus held a real difference,
but noc betore che Nativier oC Christ;
tlien hielaid Jhe Divine Word inhabitine in
Christ made him to be thereat Son of Cod.