# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0158
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0158?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 86, page id 727097563:0158
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=158
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000158.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 40 lines, status machine
# Lines: 40 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication os
dissoluble Enion betreen the chiree indivi-
dual Fssences in the divine Nature; Dut
therheld a distinction ot peculiar Pssences,
Belides the common Nature, Wvtrich ther
Called urenas Soes y idmas deornras and
Phoc. C.0d. 1d1 245 RoE15 5 25 appears by Phorius, Wto
CDd. 234
was very able to judoc. And it apPCaES
by onc ot chemselves in Photius, thac
the controversie as, Wrhether an PIrpo.
stasis could be without an individuol Fs
sence belongine t0 it CelE; Or Whecher
the peculiar Properties and Characters did
make the Fypostasis. BuF 25 +0S. Basib S
Notion, We are to oblerve; (2.) That
he malies the divine Fhencero De uncapa-
ble ofnumber, by reason ofits perfect V.
NIEY. ITere our 2nitarians teIl us, that
Wtren S. Basit Caieh, That G0d is not one in
etie Nomi- number, but in nature, he means: a5 the
natandRe Tature of Man is one, but there are mani
226, 27. particular Men, as Peter, Tames and Tohn
ecc. So the Nature of God, or the common
Divinity is one, bat there are as truely
more Gods in number, or more particular
Gods. as there are more particular Men-
But thar ehis is a erols mistakre or abuse
OF S. Basils meanine, IMall make it plain
trom himlelf. For, cher Cay, That he
Beld, tbat as to this question, Tou many
Cods: it must be ansvered, Three Cods in
number, orthree Personat God5, and one in
Nature
24.
Discourse
concernine
aVnITaT.
BaTEI. PP
41