# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0160
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0160?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 88, page id 727097563:0160
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=160
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000160.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication os
Sense quite othervise than it i5 : AS
choueh he allor d more Gods than one in
Number. Number, Caich he again, be-
lones to Duantity, and Ouantity to Bodies,
but rohat relation have these toGod, but
n se Mo- asheis the Maker of them: Number belones
vas ni F. +o materiat and circumscribed Beines; but,
vas ns a-
rans ni a laith he, the most perfect 2nity is to becon-
menuns cerved in the most simple and incomprehen-
Voia5 671
nuarri Sible FSence. Where it is observable, char
xor. BasiI. he ules thole Words Which are allod
P. II. P. 10 expressthe most perteet and lingular
926.
Petar. de VniEy. Which Petavius himsele contel-
Frinic L. Petli, thac they can never be under Atood of
+ bi fbit
a specisicke Nature: arid Curcellaeus Can
not deny, That uovos beine added 10 FIG
dothrestrain the Sense more to a numericat
Qnity, aShe calls it. Ho then is it pol-
sible to understand S. Basit oF more Oods
than one in number: And in the very lame
Pagehe mentions the 2aUZO2nS ZuS DVOEOS,
the Sameness of the divine Nature, by
Whichthe oucsoior isbetrer understood.
r. B. 106. But Curcellaeus ill have no morethan
a Specifick nity understood. Belore he
Paid, that aurosos vould have sienised
more, but nor he finds it uled, the calo
15 alter d: S0 that the Fathers could nOt
mean any ocher than a specifick Dnitr.
ler chem ule what exprestions chey pleaSd.
3