# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0166
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0166?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 94, page id 727097563:0166
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=166
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000166.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

A Vindication of
us; as he there Mes at large. Petavi-
us Wras arvare oF this, and theretore he
Paith, he quitted it and returned to the
other; Whereas he onir Caith, If his Ad
versaries be displeased with it, De thintes
ihe other sufficient. Which in MOrE 15.
that PHence in it selFis one and indivi(i.
ble; but amons Men ic is dirided accor-
dine eo the Subjects; that the divineNa-
ture is capable ofno Divition at ail, and
cheretore che difterence ot Lypostases must
be tromthe difterent Relations and Man
ner OF Subsistence.
3. TIC expresses his meonine fully in
anocher place. For in his Catechetical O.
GresNCration, he Caith, he looks on the Doctrine
sen, Lom. of the Trinity as a profound Mystery (Wrhich
d
three individuat Persons in one speciscke
Nature is Far From.) But Wvherein lies it:
Chiear in this, That there Pould beNum-
ber and no Number; different Vieu and yet
but One; a distinction of Typostases, and
vet no Division in the Subjects. For (0
his Words arC, n, S puECt 2d 2OCI
purvor; irhich is contrary ro wtrac he laid
Ot human Fsypostases. NoW, Wtrat is tho
Subject in chis cale: According 10 Cur-
cellaus hisNotion, it must De an Indivi-
dual. BBE Tince he altertS there CaM BCHO
Division in the Subjects, then he mule
Orecctro
8.