# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0168
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0168?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 96, page id 727097563:0168
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=168
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000168.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

A Pindication of
rould not allo chree LEypostases, Was,
because ther vould noc allere three sub-
Stances. So that Curcellaeus his LIypothe-
(is hath very licile colour for it amone
the Latin lathers; Cince S. Ferom there
Paith, it rould De Sacrileze to hold threc
Substances, and he Freely beltons an 1-
nathema uxon any one that alserted more
than Onc.
But sTilary, Caith Curcellaeus, oons a spe-
Cur. 1. 69. cisick 2niey, tor in his Book de Smodis,
he BCNS, That by one Substance, they did
not mean one individual Substance, but sucts
as vas in Adam and Seth, thatis of the same
kind. Noman asseres thernitr and Indis-
crimination ot the divine Substance more
fully and frequently than he doch; and
that without any Difference or Variation,
45 10 the Father and the Son. And al-
thoush asainst che drians he may use thac
For ar Illustration, ol adam and Seth; yee
ertien he comes to explain himselt, he
declares it must be understood in a way
derecable ro the divine Nature. And he
denies any Division of the Substance De-
tveen Father and Son, but he asterts one
and the lame Substance to be in Boch;
and althouch the Person of the Son remains
2. n. 6. distinet from the lerson of the Pather, vet
he sublists in that Substance of vhich he vas
becotter,
Hilar. de
FLitar. de
Frinit. B.
Synod. 
67