# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0199
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0199?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 127, page id 727097563:0199
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=199
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000199.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 49 lines, status machine
# Lines: 49 recognised, mean confidence 0.83
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

andiu
IIHS
et lite
t
 HH
seer
chei
MB
1D0
a5 a1
N
Tha
ruiI
ut Bb.
the Doctrine of the Prinier.
vould fulian have siven For Tuch atrise
Interpretation oF S. Johm: Whren hecannot Cvril. c.
deny, buc thac he did set up the Diviniti
Sulian, 1.
10. P. 4270
of Christ by thele Expressions; and up- 335.
braids theChristians ot Alexandria, for ei. Tulian ep.
vinq Worstipto Jesus as theWrord and Cod:
Wich irhat latisfaction vould he have re-
ceived Tuch a Sense ot his Words; Wrhen
5T.
he Complemented Photinus For denvins prcund.
che Divinity of Christ; While other Chri. l. 4. P. 163.
ans alterted it?
But ther do noc by any means deal
Fairly rith the late Archibistrop as to che
Scory ot Amelius; For they brins it in, 25
il he had laidthe weipht ol the c’ause ux-
On ic; Whereas he only mentions il, a5 a
Contirmation, ot a probable Conjecture,
That Plato had the Notion of the Word of
Cod from the TeWs; because that was aTi-
le Which the Tews did commonty sive to
the Messias, as he proves from Philo, and
the Chaldee Paraphrast. Fo Wwhich they
sive no manner oF AnCiver. But ther
astirm in antiver to ny Sermon, p. 9.
Thac Socinus his Sense WaS, That Christ
vas called the Word, because he was the
Brincer or Messenger of Cods Wrord. But
avere noc the Zews to understand it in the
Senle ic was known amone them: Anc
il the Chaldee Paraphrast had used it in
tl18