# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0209
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0209?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 137, page id 727097563:0209
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=209
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000209.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

1C
tb
the Doctrine of the Triniey.
eions it orly as a possible sense; but heEnied. in
contelles, That the Neu Testament saith Sol. 6. 62
nothine at al of it; but, Caith he, neither
doth it mention other thines before he en-
tred upon his Ofice. But this IS a very
reak Evation, for this as of ereatest
importance ith respect co hus OHice,
more than hus Baprism, Fastine and Tem-
pration; vec chese are very Fully set
conn.
Arid after aIl, our 2nitarians them-
selres seem to mistrust cheir oun Inter-
pretations; For in their ansiver to my ser-
mon, they Cay, it is not the Doctrine os all ansoee to
the Vnitarians, and refer me to another my sermon,
account siven of these Texts in the TTistory
P. 10.
of the Onicarians. There indecd I Aind History of
theonie.
Grotius his Interpretation (a5 they call p. 26.
it) preterd betore that oF Socinus. BuE
tler Cay, Ororius vas Socinian al over, P. 11.
and that his Annotations are a compleat Sy-
stem of Socinianism; and his Notes on the
first of S. Toln are vritien artificially. but
the Sense at the bortom is theirs. In MorE,
That the Word, accordine t0 Crocius, i5 P. 28.
not an eternal son of God, but the Pover
aid WVisdom ofCod; Wohich abidine without
measure on the Ford Christ, is therefore
spoken of as a Person and as one with Christ,
and he with that. And this Notion ofthe
WNor