# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0222
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0222?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 150, page id 727097563:0222
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=222
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000222.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication of
prover divine Worchip. Geore. Blandrata
ras unsatistied, thac Socinus did noc lay
enovoh to prove the necesliey ot theln-
vocation of Christ, Wtrich he Caid hecould
dofrom his Priesthood and his Pover, from
the Fxamples ofthe Apostles, and the very
Nature of Adoration. And Blandrata WV25
a Man of great authoriey amones the
nitarians; and he thoushe Socinus oushe
to alsere che necessity ot ic; or else he
nould do injury both to Christ and to his
Cause.
In the dilpure wich Francken, Socinus
vene uxon chis fround, thac divine Au
thorier vas a sufficient oround for divine
Worstip, althoush chere ivere not thole
essential Attributes oF Omnisciener and
Omnipotener. But I observe, chac Socinus
did noc lool on this as a matter oF Liber-
Cy, a5 our Enitarians now scem 10 do:
For in the Pretace to the Former Dispute,
he calls the firror oF denvins the Invoca
tion of Christ, noc, asther now do, a
simple Frror Or a mere mistake; but a most
filitor and pernicious Frror, an Frror that
leads to Fudaism, and is in effect the deny-
ins of Christ; and in che latter Dispute
he laith, That it tends to Fpicurism and
Dedirin. Srheism. And Smalcius Caich, That they
dre no Cbristians who refuse sivine divine
Worstip to Christ.
2. 1
Ctiralt1 6.