# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0226 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0226?run=74 # Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40) # Folio 154, page id 727097563:0226 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=226 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000226.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 42 lines, status machine # Lines: 42 recognised, mean confidence 0.82 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. e AVindication of him For his Master in thac Tonque Caith, IJe could not sufsiciently wonder at ehis Criticism of Fralmus, and thints it a violent and far. Tetched Interpretation, and not acrecable to the breek Idiom, and chat S cor is the Came chere with o5 682. And Which mar Tionihe more 10 our Enitari- ans, one ot che lcarnedst nsen ther have Incerpretation, and (aith, That the whole Verse belones to Christ. Buc it chac vill noc do, cier have another ferch in chC snsver to Cale, viz. That it is very probable that the vord 60d vas not originally in the Text. Iow doch this appear tobe verr probable: OFthat, We have this acconnE: Grorius observes, that theCreek Copies, used by the ans. 10 ihe Author of theSyriac, had not the word Cod, arcbbistop, and that Fralmus had noted, that the Co- pies of S. Cy prian, S. ITilary and S. Chry- locom had onty Blessed over ail, or above al vithont the vord G0d; upon Wwhich he charees his Adversary with no less than Im- piety in concealine this; and calls it, cheat. inq his Reader. But hom if aIl this prove a eross Mictatre inhim; untess it beonly, chat Grotius and Frasmus come infor their MareS. leS crue, thac Grorius Pait, That ansver to vord C0d vas left out in the Syriac to P 3. Ersion. But F. Simon, Whole authority The Cen. P. 29. Nilb. P. 34 M A D I et I 1I. D