# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0232
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0232?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 160, page id 727097563:0232
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=232
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000232.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication of
vere vantine in tlat which he made use of.
Jes true, ther are mancing in the Alex
andrian, and fome ochers; but in none
thac Beza had the Bioht oF, it he may DC
Believed. These are sufICienE 1O MCW,
thatchere is no go0d ProoF, that the CO.
pr erhich Beza had ivas che Pame wrhich
Morinus borrowd; and cheretore his AU.
thoriey is noc to be Aigliced in chis inat
ter, Whenhe asfrms, Thac aII the Creck
Copies agreed in readine Cod manifest in
the ftes; and Icannor imasine Beza (0
intolerably carelels as he mult have been,
il Morinus his Copy and Bezas vere the
Tae. Bur Whecher it ivere in Beza5 Co.
DY Or nOt, il s certain, they Cay, That it is
not in that ancient Manuscript, vhich is
called the Clermont Copy; ertrich is affirm.
ed by Morinus, and caten for granted by
Orters, therefore me must enquire a lic.
ele Farcher inco che Auchority oF this an-
cient CopY. IE appears by those Wtro
have vierd and considered them, thac
there are tvo very ancient Copies ot
S. PaulS stixittles, (0 exactly agrecine.
that onc is suppoled to be the Transcripe
ot the other; one is in the RinesLibra
Alabil. de rY, the ocher in chemonastery ot S. Cer-
ReDepIo. mains. Which Mabillon Caith is aThou
MaC. l. 5.
P. 346.
Cand years old. Thelo tro Copies are in
estect