# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0240
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0240?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 168, page id 727097563:0240
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=240
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000240.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication of
that Father, Son and TToly Ghest are one
Cod and prove it by the Testimony of S.
John. Tres sunt qui Testimonium perhi-
bent in caelo, Pater, Verbum (5 Spiritus
Sanctus, Co hiTres unum sunt.
3. In the former Testimony, the ou
thoriey oF che Vulcar Latin was made
usc of: and why, isit rejectedhere: When
Morinus contelles there 15 no variety in
Moritr.  the Copies OEIc. Vulcata versio hunc ver-
Cic Bib
T. Ex. = sum constanter habet. Anc he observes,
. 7. m. 9. thac chole oF the Farhers, Who seem 10
Omit it (25 5. Aurustin asainA Maximi-
nus) did not Follon ihc old Latin Ver(
On. Lucas Brusensis, Laith Only. That in
35 old Copies, they found it vantine but in
AvC. A.StOS. FeromS Prologue, Iam nOE
concerned 10 detend it; but Frasmus
thouche it had too much ofS. Terom in it,
and others thinke it hath t00 litile. F. Si-
Cricique mon contesses, that P. Pithaeus and Mabil-
XL. 69
Conthink it Wras S. Teroms, andthat it W a5
in the MSS. Buc I conclude with Pay.
ino, Thac erhroever wasthe Auclior, ac the
time wtien it as irritten, the Greek Co-
pies had this Verse, or else he Wras a nO.
torious Impoltor.
Z. The next thing P Mallaste chele wise
Interpreters of Scripture, 15, Whecher,
irtien ehe Scripture (o often aAirms, That