# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0245
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0245?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 173, page id 727097563:0245
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=245
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000245.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

er
M
DE
the Doctrine of the Friniey.
strone Reasons why, theybelieve these Words.
In the name of the Father, and of the Son,
and of tbe TToly Ghost, vere not spotre By
our Saviour, but have been added to the
Cospet of S. Macthem, from the common
Form and Practile of the Church. Why
are chele strone Reasons of learned Criticks
mentioned, but to raile Doubrs in Pco
ples minds about them: But they dectare
afterwards acainst them. Noc t00 mucti
Ot chat. For chey Cay, only, That ther P. 16.
are not without their weiche, but theyhave
observed several thines that make them
thint, that this Text is a genuine part of
Scripture. Very Wisely aud Discreetlr
Spolien. Phe Reasons are strons and weieh
cy; bur chey think otherwise. Iwistrthey
had cold the Worid, Who thele learned
Criticks vere; lest it Bould De suspected
that chey vere cheir onn Inventions. But
Ifind a certain Nameless Socinian WWas che
Auchor ot them; and his Words arepro-
duced by Sandius (a Person hictly com. Sand. In.
TerD. CC.
mended by them for his Indultry andt paradox
Learnins, buc as much condemned by O. P. 115.
chers, For manc of Still or Ingenuity.)
The reason ot irritins chele Realons San-
dius trectu Contectes Was, because this place
clearty proved a Trinity of Persons acainst
the SocimianS. Bue Whac are chese verr