# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0257
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0257?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 185, page id 727097563:0257
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=257
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000257.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 48 lines, status machine
# Lines: 48 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

of the Doctrine of the Priniev.
lodeed in distinet Persons and administred
in several manners; that nothine over-
chrew che divine Monarchy, buc a different
Pover and Authority, Wrhich they did by
no means aAterr. They held a Son, but C. 4
Ot the Substance of the Father, and a FTo-
ly Chost from the Father by the Son: he
AiiI Recps co the distinction ot
Perlons, and che vnity of, Alium aurem quomo-
Substance. And he utteriy de-
do accipere debus jam
protessus Tum, Person
nies any Division of Esences or non subltantix nomine,
separate Substances; for there-
in he laith, lay the TTeresie
of Valentinus, in makine a Pro-
ad Distinetionem, non
ad Divitionem, cacerum
ubique ceneo unam (ub-
Stanciam in eribus cohx
rentibus. Advers. Pron.
lation of a separate Beine. BUL c. 12.
althouoh he Caith, the Cospet
hath declared t0 us, that the
Father is God the Son G0d.
and the TToly Chost 60d, vet
ve are taucht that there is stilt
but one God: redactum est jarm
Ec Termo erac opud
Deum de nunguam se-
paratus à Patre auc alius
a Pacre, quia cg0 _ Pacet
unum sumus. HIxe e
rac probola veritatis.
custos uniratis qua pro-
latum dicimus Filium à
Patre, led non separa-
nomen Dei e Domim in unt. cum. 6. 8.
Onc, c. 13. Wherebe the Chri-
stians are distinguistred from the FTeathens
ivho had many 60d5. This is rhe force ot
Whrac Tertullian Caith uxon chis matter.
And Wtrat Cay our 2nitarians to it:
They cannoc deny chat he vas an ante-
Nicene Father; and it is plain thac he did
underAand tbe Form of Baptism (0 as 10
I1