# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0261
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0261?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 189, page id 727097563:0261
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=261
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000261.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 56 lines, status machine
# Lines: 56 recognised, mean confidence 0.78
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

et
e
ere
do
A
IM
AHr.
dito
plies
AMI.
ent
but
11 db
ree
et
eso
et
Do
rtu
tri
the Doctrine of the Priniey.
odoret tells us, and Terrullian Caith as much Theodor.
HaeFl. 3. 6. 2.
et thole Cataphrrcians Who Tollo d Terrul. de
schines: But chele Montanists are distin- Praler. c. 5.
suistedtrom the rect. And Rigaltius ob.
isalE. in
Tertul. 2d
terres, that Tertullian Tollon d Montanus Praxean.
chreay in wrhrat related to Dilcipline,
and thac himselE was not (o corrupted in
Doint ot Doctrine a5 lome of his Fol
IOWerS EVerC.
2. IES Objected, That TercullianS Do- Ante. Ni-
etrine is incon sistent with the Doctrine of the
Trinity; for he denies the eternal Genera-
tion of the Son; and only alserts an Fmission
of him before the Creation.
Buc my bulinels is noc to justitie aIl
TertullianS Exprections or Similicudes; For
Nen oF Wic and Fancy love togo out ot
the Road, and lometimes involve chinss
more by Arcempis to explainthem; bue
Itcep onty ro that wtrich he Caich, Wa5
ehe Faith of the Church fromthe berinnine:
and IIceno realon to call in Cuection his
Fideliey in reportins, hoverer he miohe
be untrappy in hus Explications.
3. Tertullian himself CaicB, Schlichtinei-
us, in other Places, Where hespeates of the
rule of Faith, doth not mention the FToly
CCn. P. 27.
Chost; and therefore this seems added By P. 12:
him for the sake of the Paraclete. But chis
can be oF no torce, 10 any one chat cOn.
siders.