# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0264
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0264?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 192, page id 727097563:0264
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=264
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000264.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

A Vindication of
sles to baptize in the Name of Father, Son
and TToly Chost, and in the Sacrament
of this Trinity they ivere to baptize. Doth
Marcion hola ehis Trinity: S0 thac S. Cy.
prian Cuppoled the validies ot Baptismto
depend on che Faith ot cheTrinitr. And
if he had gone no tarther, Id0 not leo
hou he had transoresed the Rules of. thc
Church; but his Error Was, chathe made
veid Baptilm uxon difterence ot Commu-
nion, and cherein he ras justly oppoled.
Buc che Marcionites Baptilm was rejected
in che Fastern Church, because ot their
Doctrine about che Trinity.
In the Paris oF Asia about F phesus, Noe-
rus had broachedthie lame Doctrinc, Which
Praxeas had doncellerhere. For whrich
he was called to an acconne, and himsels
with his Follovers ve cast out of the Churches
Communion, 25 P. piphanius reporis, Which
is another considerable Testimons ot the
ExiphhxBense oF che Churchat thactime. Ppiphani-
uslaith, he was the first who broached thatBla-
Sphemy: buc Theodoret mentions Fpiconus
and Cleomenes betore him; it leems, that he
wasthe firit who as publickls cabenno-
tice offoric; and cheretore underirent the
Censure of che Church ich his Disciples.
When he was trit Cummon d to aulver,
he denied rhat he asserted any such Do
Etrine:
BasIFpilt.
aos
xCl. 57. H. 1